An introduction to the study of fishesGünther, Albert C. L. G. (Albert Carl Ludwig Gotthilf)
Science
An introduction to the study of fishes
Günther, Albert C. L. G. (Albert Carl Ludwig Gotthilf)
Fishes; Ichthyology
Indeed, in deposits belonging to the Lower Silurian and Devonian, in
Russia, England, and North America, minute, slender, pointed horny
bodies, bent like a hook, with sharp opposite margins, have been found
and described under the name of _Conodonts_. More frequently they
possess an elongated basal portion, in which there is generally a
larger tooth with rows of similar but smaller denticles on one or both
sides of the larger tooth, according as this is central or at one end
of the base. In other examples there is no prominent central tooth,
but a series of more or less similar teeth is implanted on a straight
or curved base. Modifications of these arrangements are very numerous,
and many Palæontologists entertain still doubts whether the origin
of these remains is not rather from Annelids and Mollusks than from
Fishes.
[See G. J. Hinde, in “Quarterly Journal of the Geological
Society,” 1879.]
The first undeniable evidence of a fish, or, indeed, of a vertebrate
animal, occurs in the _Upper Silurian_ Rocks, in a bone-bed of the
Downton sandstone, near Ludlow. It consists of compressed, slightly
curved, ribbed spines, of less than two inches in length (_Onchus_); of
small shagreen-scales (_Thelodus_); the fragment of a jaw-like bar with
pluricuspid teeth (_Plectrodus_); the cephalic bucklers of what seems
to be a species of _Pteraspis_; and, finally, the coprolitic bodies
of phosphate and carbonate of lime, including recognisable remains of
the Mollusks and Crinoids inhabiting the same waters. But no vertebra
or other part of the skeleton has been found. The spines and scales
seem to have belonged to the same kind of fish, which probably was a
Plagiostome. It is quite uncertain whether or not the jaw (if it be the
jaw of a fish[16]) belonged to the buckler-bearing _Pteraspis_, the
position of which among Ganoids, with which it is generally associated,
is open to doubt.
No detached undoubted tooth of a Plagiostome or Ganoid scale has been
discovered in the Ludlow deposits: but so much is certain that those
earliest remains in Palæozoic rocks belonged to fishes closely allied
to forms occurring in greater abundance in the succeeding formation,
the Devonian, where they are associated with undoubted Palæichthyes,
Plagiostomes as well as Ganoids.
* * * * *
These fish-remains of the _Devonian_ or _Old Red Sandstone_, can be
determined with greater certainty. They consist of spines or the
so-called _Ichthyodorulites_, which show sufficiently distinctive
characters to be referred to several genera, one of them, _Onchus_,
still surviving from the Silurian epoch. All these spines are believed
to be those of Chondropterygians, to which order some pluricuspid
teeth (_Cladodus_) from the Old Red Sandstone in the vicinity of St.
Petersburg have been referred likewise.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account