An introduction to the study of mammals living and extinctLydekker, Richard
Science
An introduction to the study of mammals living and extinct
Lydekker, Richard
Mammals
permanent _p_ 4 be still buried there (in which case, of course, that
first tooth is only _p_ 3), or behind the last visible molar to see if
there be yet another tooth behind it, showing it to be _m_ 3 and not _m_
4. The first plan is, as a rule, the better, since _p_ 4 is generally by
far the most important tooth for diagnostic purposes, and its characters
have, therefore, in any case to be taken into account.”
The _Macropodidæ_ are divided into three well-marked sections: (1)
the true Kangaroos (_Macropodinæ_); (2) a group consisting of smaller
animals, commonly called Rat Kangaroos, or (improperly) “Kangaroo Rats,”
or sometimes Potoroos; and (3) the _Hypsiprymnodontinæ_, now represented
only by a single species.
Subfamily =Hypsiprymnodontinæ=.—Size very small. Claws small, feeble,
and subequal. Hind feet with an opposable hallux. Tail naked and scaly.
The fourth premolar twisted obliquely outwards, as in _Phalanger_. Other
teeth as in the _Potoroinæ_.
This subfamily is now represented only by the genus _Hypsiprymnodon_,[68]
which is a form of great interest, as showing a structure of foot
connecting that of the Kangaroos with that of the Phalangers. The
single known species, _H. moschatus_, was described by Ramsay from
specimens discovered in north-east Australia. It was described almost
simultaneously by Owen under the name of _Pleopus nudicaudatus_. From
the resemblance in the structure of the foot and the obliquity of the
premolars to the Phalangers Mr. Thomas has some hesitation as to which
family should receive this genus, but the macropine characters of the
mandible preponderate in favour of the _Macropodidæ_.
_Triclis._[69]—A lower jaw of a much larger form from the Pleistocene
deposits of Australia apparently indicates another member of this
subfamily, having the outwardly directed and grooved premolar
characteristic of _Hypsiprymnodon_. It differs, however, from that genus,
and also from all other known _Macropodidæ_, in having a small tooth
between the incisor and fourth premolar, which apparently represents a
canine, or perhaps an anterior premolar. This form indicates, therefore,
a closer connexion between the _Phalangeridæ_ and _Macropodidæ_ than any
other.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account