A comparison of these two forms shows that both are composed of the same
elements: (1) The cycle sign; (2) a superfix in which the hand is the
principal element.
The superfix in figure 61, _d_, consists of a hand and a tassel-like
postfix, not unlike the upper half of the ending signs in figure 37, _l-q_.
However, in the present case, if we accept the hypothesis that _d_ of
figure 61 is the sign for the great-great cycle, we are obliged to see in
its superfix alone the essential _element_ of the great-great-cycle sign,
since the _rest_ of this glyph (the lower part) is quite clearly the normal
form for the cycle.
The superfix in figure 61, _e_, consists of the same two elements as the
above, with the slight difference that the hand in _e_ holds a rod. Indeed,
the similarity of the two forms is so close that in default of {120} any
evidence to the contrary the writer believes they may be accepted as signs
for one and the same period, namely, the great-great cycle.
The points on which this conclusion is based may be summarized as follows:
1. Both glyphs are made up of the same elements--(_a_) The normal form of
the cycle sign; (_b_) a superfix composed of a hand with a tassel-like
postfix.
2. Both glyphs occur in numerical series the next term but one of which is
the cycle, showing that by position they are the logical next term but one,
the seventh or great-great cycle, of the series.
3. Both of these glyphs stand next to glyphs which have been identified as
great-cycle signs, that is, the sixth terms of the series in which they
occur.
By this same line of reasoning it seems probable that A2 in figure 60 is
the sign for the great-great-great cycle, although this fact can not be
definitely established because of the lack of comparative evidence.
This possible sign for the great-great-great cycle, or period of the 8th
order, is composed of two parts, just like the signs for the great cycle
and the great-great cycle already described. These are: (1) The cycle sign;
(2) a superfix composed of a hand and a semicircular postfix, quite
distinct from the superfixes of the great cycle and great-great cycle
signs.
However, since there is no other inscription known which presents a number
composed of eight terms, we must lay aside this line of investigation and
turn to another for further light on this point.
An examination of figure 60 shows that the glyphs which we have identified
as the signs for the higher periods (A2, A3, A4, and A5,) contain one
element common to all--the sign for the cycle, or period of 144,000 days.
Indeed, A5 is composed of this sign alone with its usual coefficient of 9.
Moreover, the next glyphs (A6, A7, A8, and A9[83]) are the signs for the
katun, tun, uinal, and kin, respectively, and, together with A5, form a
regular descending series of 5 terms, all of which are of known value.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account