3. The spontanistic teachings in turn part company in respect to the non-legal controlling principle which they affirm in contrast to the State as the basis of the social human life for our future. According to Godwin, the place of the State ought to be taken by a social human life based on the principle that the general happiness should be every one's rule of action. According to Stirner, the place of the State ought to be taken by a social human life based on the principle that each one's own happiness should be his rule of action. According to Tolstoi, the place of the State ought to be taken by a social human life based on the principle that love should be every one's rule of action. II. With regard to what they have in common in their relation to the State, the seven recognized Anarchistic teachings here presented may be taken as equivalent to the entire body of recognized Anarchistic teachings. In their relation to the State they have only this one thing in common, that they negate the State for our future--and in very different senses at that. But this is common to all recognized Anarchistic teachings: observation of any recognized Anarchistic teaching shows that in one sense or another it negates the State for our future. Furthermore, as regards the specialties that they exhibit in their relation to the State the teachings here presented may be taken as equivalent to the entire body of Anarchistic teachings without limitation. For the specialties represented among them can be arranged as a system which affords no room for any more co-ordinate specialties, but only for subordinate. No Anarchistic teaching, therefore, can have any specialty that will not be subordinate to these specialties. Therefore, what is true of the seven teachings here presented is true of the Anarchistic teachings altogether. In their relation to the State they have in common their negating the State for our future; and with regard to the differences in what they affirm for our future in contrast to the State they are to be divided as shown in the table on page 280. ======================================================= | _Federalistic Teachings_ | _Spontanistic Teachings_ | |==========================+==========================| | Proudhon | Godwin | | Bakunin | Stirner | | Kropotkin | Tolstoi | | Tucker | | 5.--PROPERTY I. In their relation to property--that is, to that legal relation by virtue of which some one has within a certain group of men the exclusive privilege of ultimately disposing of a thing--the seven teachings here presented have nothing in common.