[1174] Rienzi p. 43. [1175] Bernatzik pp. 2, 3. [1176] Lenz p. 5. [1177] Crispi p. 4. [1178] Stammler pp. 2, 4, 34, 36. [1179] Lenz pp. 1, 4. [1180] Garraud p. 12, Tripels p. 253. [1181] Silio p. 145. [1182] Reichesberg pp. 14, 16. [1183] Bernstein p. 359. [1184] Lenz p. 5. [1185] Bernatzik p. 3. [1186] "_Hintermaenner_" p. 14. [1187] Reichesberg p. 30. [1188] "_Hintermaenner_" p. 14. [1189] Lombroso p. 31. [1190] Silio p. 145, Dubois p. 213. [1191] Proal p. 50. [1192] Lombroso p. 31. [1193] Sernicoli vol. 2 p. 67, Garraud pp. 3, 4. [1194] "_Die historische Entwickelung des Anarchismus_" p. 16; Zenker p. 161. [1195] Rienzi p. 9; Stammler pp. 28-31; Merlino pp. 18, 27; Shaw p. 23. [1196] Garraud p. 6; Lenz p. 5. [1197] Sernicoli vol. 2 p. 116; Garraud p. 2; Reichesberg p. 38; Van Hamel p. 113. [1198] Lombroso pp. 31, 35. [1199] Garraud pp. 10-11; Lombroso p. 34; Ferri p. 257. CONCLUSION 1. The personal want that impelled us toward a scientific knowledge of Anarchism has met with some satisfaction. The concepts of Anarchism and its species have been defined; the most important errors have been removed; the most prominent Anarchistic teachings of earlier and recent times have been presented in detail. We have become acquainted with Anarchism's armory. We have seen all that can be objected against the State from all possible standpoints. We have been shown the most diverse orders of life as destined to take the State's place in future. The transition from the State to these orders of life has been represented to us in the most manifold ways. He who would know Anarchism still more intimately, investigate the less notable teachings as well as the most prominent, and assign to both these and those their place in the causal nexus of historical events, will now find at least the foundation laid for his work. He knows with what sorts of teachings, and what parts of these teachings, he must concern himself, and what questions he must put to each of them. In this investigation he must expect many surprises: the teaching of the unknown Pisacane will astonish him by its originality, and that of the much-talked-of Most will show itself to be only a coarsened form of Kropotkin's. But on the whole it is hardly likely that the investigation will be worth the trouble it takes: the special ideas that Anarchism has to offer are given with tolerable completeness in the seven teachings here presented. 2. The external want on account of which Anarchism had to be scientifically known may now also be satisfied. One thing we must at any rate do with regard to Anarchism: examine its teachings, as to their soundness or unsoundness, with courage, composure, and impartiality. But success in this task can be expected only if we no longer wander about aimlessly in the night of jurisprudential skepticism, or try to light it up with the lantern of dogmatism, but rather keep our eye fixed upon the guiding star of criticism.