=125. Old and New Theories of the Arch.=—In the older theories of the
arch, considered as a series of blocks simply abutting against each
other, the resultant loading on each block was assumed to be vertical.
In the modern theories, on the other hand, the resultant loading on any
block is taken precisely as it is, either vertical or inclined, as the
case may be. Many arches are loaded with earth over their arch-rings.
This earth loading produces a horizontal pressure against each of the
stones, as well as a vertical loading due to its own weight. In such
cases it is necessary to recognize this horizontal or lateral pressure
of the earth, as it is called, as a part of the arch loading.
It is known from the theory of earth pressure that the amount of that
pressure per square foot or any other square unit may vary between
rather wide limits, the upper of which is called the abutting power
of earth, and the latter the conjugate pressure due to its own weight
only. If _w_ is the weight per cubic unit of earth and _x_ the depth
considered, and if φ be the angle of repose of the earth, the abutting
power per square unit will have the value:
1 + sin φ
_p_ = _wx_ ---------. (64)
1 - sin φ
while the horizontal or conjugate pressure due to the weight of earth
only will be:
1 - sin φ
_pʹ_ = _wx_ ---------. (65)
1 + sin φ
The use of these formulæ will be illustrated by actual arch
computations.
[Illustration: FIG. 36.]
[Illustration: FIG. 37.]
Fig. 36 is supposed to show a set of ring-stones for an arch of any
curvature whatever. The joints _LM_ and _ON_ represent the skew-backs
or springing joints, while _R_ and _R₁_ represent the supporting
forces or reactions with centres of action at _aʹ_ and _a₁_. The ring
is divided into blocks or pieces by the joints at _a_, _b_, _c_, _d_,
and _e_, the resultant loading or force on each block being given by
the lines with arrow-heads and numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7. Fig.
37 represents a force polygon constructed in the ordinary manner by
laying off carefully to scale the two reactions _R_ and _R₁_, together
with the loads or forces numbered 1 to 7, inclusive. By constructing
the so-called polygonal frame in the ring-stones of Fig. 36 in the
usual manner with its lines or sides parallel to the radiating lines in
Fig. 37, as shown by the broken lines, the points _a_, _b_, _c_, etc.,
are found where the resultant forces cut each joint. The line drawn
through those points thus determined is called the line of resistance
of the arch. Obviously, if that line of resistance be determined, the
complete stability or instability of the arch, as the case may be, will
be established. Furthermore, the complete determination of the force
polygon in Fig. 37, and the corresponding polygonal frame drawn in the
arch-ring, constitute all the computations involved in the design of an
arch.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account