=132. Cantilever Bridges.=—Figs. 41 and 42 exhibit in skeleton outline
two prominent cantilever designs for structures in this country.
That shown in Fig. 41 was intended for a bridge across the Hudson
River between Sixtieth and Seventieth streets, New York City. The
main central opening has a span of 1800 feet, and a length of 2000
feet between centres of towers. Fig. 42 shows the Monongahela River
cantilever bridge,[3] now being built at Pittsburgh, Penn. Both figures
exhibit the prominent features of the cantilever system. The main parts
are the towers, at each end of the centre span, which are 534.5 feet
high in the North River Bridge and 135 feet high in the Monongahela
River structure, and the central main or river span with its simple
non-continuous truss hung from the ends of the cantilever brackets or
arms which flank it on both sides. These cantilever arms are simply
projecting trusses continuous with the shore- or anchor-arms. They
rest on the piers at either end of the main span, as a lever rests
on its fulcrum. This arrangement requires the shore extremities or
the anchor-arms to be anchored down by a heavy weight formed by the
masonry piers at those points. Recapitulating and starting from the two
shore ends of the structure, there are the anchor-spans, continuous
at the towers, with the cantilever arms projecting outward toward the
centre of the main opening and supporting at their ends the suspended
truss, which is a simple, non-continuous one. It is thus evident that
the cantilever bridge is a structure composed of continuous trusses
with points of contraflexure permanently fixed at the ends of the
suspended span. The greatest bending moments are at the towers, and
the great depth at that point is given for the purpose of affording
adequate resistance to those moments by the members of the structure.
The following statement shows some elements of the more prominent
cantilever bridges of this country and of the Forth Bridge:
[3] This bridge was designed by and is being constructed under the
direction of Messrs. Boller and Hodge, Consulting Engineers, New York
City.
Length of Cantilever
Name. Opening, Centre to Total Length.
Centre of Towers.
Pittsburgh 812 feet. 1504 feet.
Red Rock (Colo.) 660 ” 990 ”
Memphis (Tenn.) 790.48 ” 2378.2 ”
Forth 1710 ” 5330 ”
The arrangement of web members of cantilever structures is designed to
be such as will transfer the loads from the points of application to
the points of support in the shortest and most direct paths. Both Figs.
41 and 42 show these general results accomplished by an advantageous
arrangement of web members.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account