Ancient rhetoric and poetic : $b Interpreted from representative worksBaldwin, Charles Sears
History
Ancient rhetoric and poetic : $b Interpreted from representative works
Baldwin, Charles Sears
Classical literature -- History and criticism -- Theory, etc.; Poetics -- History -- To 1500; Rhetoric, Ancient
[28] The verb here translated _make_ corresponds to the noun _poet_.
The insistence brought about by the repetition will be made clear by
rendering the words italicized _creator_ and _create_, or, to revive an
older use, _maker_ and _make_.
[29] ix. 1451 b.
[30] ix. 1451 b.
[31] ix. 1452 a.
[32] περιπέτεια.
[33] ἀναγνώρισις.
[34] xi. 1452 b.
[35] Both Butcher and Bywater so interpret; but Butcher’s rendering
“tragic incident” seems hardly to meet the context. Bywater’s rendering
“suffering” seems preferable if we may venture to interpret it as
meaning, more generally than Bywater suggests, the working out of the
plot to its full emotional expression. So taken, it corresponds to the
climax of pity and fear, as “reversal” and “recognition” correspond to
the preceding complication.
[36] xii. 1452 b. This has been challenged as an interpolation. It is at
least meager and, as it were, impatient, as is the corresponding section
in the _Rhetoric_ (III. xiii. 1414 b) on the formal parts of an oration.
[37] διπλοῦν. The context seems to show that this means _divided_ in
interest and issue, insufficiently focused. Aristotle does not mean that
the plot should not be complicated; for at the opening of this chapter he
says that the plot of the perfect tragedy is not simple, but complicated
(μὴ ἁπλῆν ἀλλὰ πεπλεγμένην). What he adds here is that the complication
should not be such as to divide our sympathy. The plot should not,
indeed, be simple; but it should be single.
[38] xiii. 1453 a.
[39] xv.
[40] xiv. 1453 b. ἐξ αὐτῆς τῆς συστάσεως τῶν πραγμάτων.
[41] See the tabular view, page 136.
[42] I follow Bywater’s note, pages 227-228.
[43] 1454 b.
[44] ἀναγνώρισις. 1454 b. “This and the next two chapters form a sort
of Appendix; they discuss a series of special points and rules of
construction which had been omitted in the sketch of the general theory
of the μῦθος.” Bywater, page 233. I am not convinced of an interruption
here. What seems to me the bearing of this chapter and the following on
the discussion of consistency from Chapter xiii on is indicated in the
tabular view on page 136.
[45] 1455 a.
[46] xvii. 1455 a.
[47] xvii. 1455 b.
[48] xviii. 1455 b.
[49] xviii. 1456 a.
[50] xviii. 1456 a.
[51] Page 138. As to whether xx is an interpolation, see Bywater.
[52] xxii. 1459 a.
[53] xxiii. 1459 a.
[54] A most striking exemplification of this is _Paradise Lost_.
[55] Sainte-Beuve, _Étude sur Virgile_, vii. page 151, disputes the
superiority of drama to epic.
[56] The most familiar instances are certain plays of Ibsen. Of plays
recently on the stage, Bernstein’s _Voleur_, Mirbeau’s _Les affaires
sont les affaires_, Besier’s _Don_, Kenyon’s _Kindling_, show that this
type of dramatic movement is not confined to any particular school.
Of plays that on the contrary dispense with this and rely mainly on
characterization the most familiar to Americans is the dramatization of
_Rip Van Winkle_ used by Joseph Jefferson.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account