Ancient rhetoric and poetic : $b Interpreted from representative worksBaldwin, Charles Sears
History
Ancient rhetoric and poetic : $b Interpreted from representative works
Baldwin, Charles Sears
Classical literature -- History and criticism -- Theory, etc.; Poetics -- History -- To 1500; Rhetoric, Ancient
Later, or secondary, epic is not the transmission of legends still
active, but the re-creation of a past already remote. Still appealing
to a communal sense of the heroic, it adapts the old epic mode to an
audience more sophisticated not only in life, but in poetic art. The
poet is thus at once more imitative and more original. He binds himself
by traditions of subject-matter, of form, and of style; but within
this recognized mode he composes with more individual freedom and to a
more definite end. Relying less on scenes in a series, he selects and
manipulates toward more artistic sequence. Since his descriptions must be
less immediate, he develops the art of narrative. Endeavoring to remain
the spokesman of his people—for otherwise he must forfeit the communal
mainspring of epic—he interprets their past by his own message for their
future. Thus he may be all the more a poet, or maker. He cannot hope for
the fresh immediacy of primary epic; but in compensation he has greater
opportunity to move his people by his own vision. Milton’s conception,
vast as is its scope, is essentially the same. He interprets the Bible as
the epic of mankind in terms of a Puritan theocracy. Tasso re-creates a
departed chivalry to animate a vision of devotion and redemption. Vergil,
the great example of secondary epic, makes of the Trojan story, of Roman
legend, of myth and cult and drama and history, of all that enriched the
Roman past, a progressive vision of Roman destiny.
Primary epic and secondary epic, though thus distinguishable, are both
epic. They are complementary. They reveal different capacities of a
single artistic mode. Epic is constant. It was; it was again; it is; for
aught that we can see, it will be. Extended poetic narrative of great
deeds for communal inspiration, though it has never been common, has
never been extinct. Primary epic seems inevitable. The minstrel in the
hall of Hrothgar is poetically identical with the minstrel in the hall of
Alcinous.[2] Both hint to us of what epic was made, and how; both show
us its constancy. This primary form of epic can never, of course, recur.
It has been civilized away. But meantime it has established a poetic art
that is permanent. The word epic still connotes a distinct mode. To this
Vergil deliberately conformed, and Milton. Secondary epic is still epic.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account