Ancient rhetoric and poetic : $b Interpreted from representative worksBaldwin, Charles Sears
History
Ancient rhetoric and poetic : $b Interpreted from representative works
Baldwin, Charles Sears
Classical literature -- History and criticism -- Theory, etc.; Poetics -- History -- To 1500; Rhetoric, Ancient
3. Agamemnon debates whether to sacrifice Iphigenia, when
Calchas has declared that the Trojan expedition cannot
otherwise set sail with the consent of the gods.
4. Alexander the Great debates the entry into Babylon after the
auguries have warned that danger lurks for him there.
5. The Athenians debate whether to remove the monuments of
their victories over the Persians, Xerxes having threatened to
come back unless they do so.
6. Cicero debates whether to appeal to Antonius for mercy.
7. Cicero debates whether to burn his writings, Antonius having
offered him immunity on this condition.[36]
That the subjects seem to have been always historical reminds us that
Roman deliberative oratory was barred from its natural field of the
living present. Thus restricted, it is meager even for a school exercise.
(2) _Subjects for Controversiæ_
The cases assigned for the _controversiæ_ of older students, though more
various, were even more removed from actuality. The list of those used by
Seneca to exhibit the skill of the rhetors themselves fully justifies the
exclamation of Tacitus,[37] _quales, per fidem!_ Posed as available for
argument on either side—a rhetor would sometimes espouse now one side,
now the other—they are difficult, subtle, sensational, often so dubious
as to preclude quotation, always remote. On their face they were chosen
and iterated by men who desired sensation, prized ingenuity, and had
turned the art of persuasion to advertisement.
_A Disinheriting Uncle_ (I. 1)
“Children who refuse support to their parents are liable to
imprisonment.”
Two brothers quarreled. The son of one of them, in spite
of his father’s prohibition, supported his uncle, who had
fallen into poverty. Disinherited on this account, he made
no legal protest. He was adopted by his uncle. Through a
legacy the uncle became rich. The father began to be in want.
The son supported him in spite of the uncle’s prohibition.
He was disinherited. [Speak for either the young man or the
disinheriting uncle.]
_The Pirate Chief’s Daughter_ (I. 6)
[A young man] captured by pirates wrote to his father for
ransom. He was not ransomed. The pirate chief’s daughter
induced him to promise marriage if he got his freedom. He
promised. She left her father to follow him. He has returned to
his father and has married her. An orphan heiress comes along.
His father bids him repudiate the pirate chief’s daughter and
marry the heiress. When he refuses, he is disinherited. [Defend
either the father or the son.]
_An Oath of Husband and Wife_ (II. 2)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account