Ancient Rome and Modern America; A Comparative Study of Morals and MannersFerrero, Guglielmo
History
Ancient Rome and Modern America; A Comparative Study of Morals and Manners
Ferrero, Guglielmo
America -- Civilization; Europe -- Civilization; Justice, Administration of -- Rome; Progress
The surprise, the scandal, the jubilation, the amusement, according
to each man’s disposition and party, were great in Rome when this
result was announced. In truth, whoever, after the lapse of so many
centuries, reads the history of the trial will find no difficulty in
believing Cicero when he accuses Crassus of having secured Clodius’s
acquittal by the exercise of pressure and corruption. In no other way
can be explained the fact that a Roman Court of law, forced to choose
between Cicero and Causinius, believed Causinius. Nevertheless, it is
certain that Clodius was much helped in this struggle by the political
mistakes of the Conservative party, by their blind relentlessness, and
by the obstinacy with which they had endeavoured for so long to bring
about, to the detriment of Clodius, a change in the method of choosing
the judges. At this epoch, justice in Rome was much too much exposed
to the influence of politics. If, however, the times were disturbed,
if the parties were divided by acute discord and men’s minds inflamed
by the memories of a terrible civil war, the sense of justice was,
nevertheless, not yet so much blunted by party passions as to allow
the dominant party to abuse their own power beyond a certain point.
Clodius might be a man little deserving of public interest; but there
were many persons in Rome to whom it was repugnant that, even for the
purpose of punishing a sacrilege, recourse should be had to means so
unusual, revolutionary, and extreme.
So the Popular party, with the support of the general sentiment of
legality, had succeeded in checkmating the Conservative party, the
Sullan association. The checkmate in itself was, however, not a
serious one, because the trial of Clodius had not been so important
and complex that his acquittal could seriously weaken the strength of
the Conservative party. The indirect consequences, on the other hand,
were most serious. The first was that Clodius went over body and soul
to the Popular party, and became the boldest and most violent of its
leaders. If the Conservative party had followed Cicero’s advice and
abandoned Clodius to the infamy which his act must have brought upon
him, there would have been an end of Clodius. The man who had profaned
the mysteries of the _Bona Dea_ would not have dared to show himself
any more in public. By persecuting him as it did, and by giving him the
chance of posing before the public as the victim of its persecutions,
this unpopular party saved his career, or at least helped to enable him
to continue to play a part in the political world of Rome, and a part
fraught with danger to the State. Clodius, realising that, after the
trial, he could no longer hope for anything from the Conservative party
in which he had grown up and in whose ranks he had fought, turned to
the Popular party; and, in order to make that party forget his origin,
his relations, and the _Bona Dea_ scandal, became the most violent and
turbulent of its chiefs.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account