Ancient Rome and Modern America; A Comparative Study of Morals and MannersFerrero, Guglielmo
History
Ancient Rome and Modern America; A Comparative Study of Morals and Manners
Ferrero, Guglielmo
America -- Civilization; Europe -- Civilization; Justice, Administration of -- Rome; Progress
If, however, the violent disputes of parties no longer raged in the
Senate; if blows were no longer exchanged in the Forum when the
election of the magistrates or the discussion of the laws was toward;
if the threat of civil war no longer hovered continually over the
heads of all, concord was not, for all that, re-established in the
ranks of the aristocracy which surrounded Cæsar’s family and which
ought to have helped that family to govern the immense Empire. Men’s
feelings were as much divided as ever, though for different motives.
Tiberius, the second _princeps_ in three years chosen by the Senate
as successor of Augustus, was hated by one section of the Roman
aristocracy, which judged him too old-fashioned—too closely bound to
the traditions of the old nobility and of his family, the Claudii; too
stern, hard, and rigid; too much out of sympathy with the new customs
and new refinements that were beginning to flow from Egypt into Italy;
too close-fisted and too keen a professor of a scrupulous and strict
financial policy; worst of all, too cautious in his foreign policy.
An old warrior, who had passed the best years of his life fighting on
the Rhine and the Danube against the barbarians, a consummate diplomat,
head and shoulders above all his contemporaries in matters of war and
diplomacy, Tiberius had convinced himself that Rome had not strength
enough to extend her empire beyond the Rhine and the Danube, and that,
therefore, she ought to rest content with the empire which she had
already won, which was, after all, vast enough for a tiny aristocracy
like that which was seated at Rome. The malcontents, however,—and
there were many of these, especially among the younger generation,—not
only did not recognise Tiberius’s wisdom, but imputed this sagacious
prudence of his to inexperience, to fear, or to envy of the young and
brilliant Germanicus.
The son of Drusus, the brother whom Tiberius had so much loved, the
adopted son of Tiberius, who had been enjoined by Augustus to adopt
him, intelligent, brilliant, generous, well-educated, handsome,
affable, inclined to be light-headed and casual like most youths who
are fortune’s favourites, Germanicus was the idol of all the enemies
of Tiberius. He was, and he was conscious of being, their idol, and,
without assuming too openly an attitude of opposition, he willingly
let himself be worshipped and extolled by the faction opposed to
his adoptive father, which faction was strong enough to exercise an
effective pressure on the Senate and throughout the State. In fact,
Germanicus, who after the death of Augustus had been sent by Tiberius
to take command of the legions of the Rhine, had dared to follow a
policy of his own, differing from that of Tiberius, on the Rhine,
crossing the great river on his own initiative, and making a long and
hazardous incursion into the territories abandoned by Rome after the
defeat of Varus.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account