Again, while it is evident from the parallel striation on some of
the fragments, on which the traces of glaze still remain, that they
were manufactured on the wheel, an inspection of Figs. 160, 161, and
181, proves that hand-wrought vessels were also manufactured after
the introduction of glaze. That sepulchral urns were all made by hand
is not a sufficient proof that the wheel was not simultaneously in
use among the same people. The extraordinary conservatism, as regards
changes in religious ceremonies, displayed by all nations and in all
ages, is a sufficient explanation of the persistency with which the
hand-wrought vessels have continued in use for sepulchral purposes.
Hence, I can conceive that to substitute for the latter others made on
the wheel, though at the same time largely used for domestic purposes,
would have been an intolerable innovation on the religious customs of
the people.
The Rev. Canon Greenwell, F.R.S., in discussing the question whether
the various early sepulchral vessels were especially made for the
purposes of burial, or were originally manufactured for domestic use,
thus writes:--
"But perhaps the strongest objection to their having fulfilled a
purpose in the household, is the fact that they possess but little
in common with the pottery which, without much doubt, is domestic.
It is true that not very much of this has been discovered, but
quite enough has been found to enable us to judge pretty accurately
of its character. It has not, indeed, been proved conclusively that
the people who occupied the hut-circles and pit-dwellings were
those who erected the barrows so often met with in close proximity
to them; but if we may judge, as I think we fairly may, from the
identity of the flint implements found in each, there can be little
doubt that they were, the one the dwelling-place, the other the
burial-place, of the same people. Now, the pottery which has been
discovered on the site of dwelling-places is a dark-coloured,
hard-baked, perfectly plain ware, without ornament of any kind,
is in fact just what we would expect domestic pottery to be, and
has nothing in which it resembles the sepulchral vessels. And
more than this, so far as I know of my own experience, or can
learn from that of others, no whole vessel, or even fragments, of
the ordinary sepulchral pottery of the barrows or other places
of sepulture has ever been met with in connection with places of
habitation."--(_British Barrows_, p. 106.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account