Anecdotes of Painters, Engravers, Sculptors and Architects, and Curiosities of Art (Vol. 1 of 3)Spooner, Shearjashub
History
Anecdotes of Painters, Engravers, Sculptors and Architects, and Curiosities of Art (Vol. 1 of 3)
Spooner, Shearjashub
Art -- Anecdotes; Artists -- Anecdotes
“_Guadalajara._--It appears that out of four hundred and thirty
pictures, a few only were considered to be originals of any value,
and were attributed to Ribera, Zurbaran, Carreño, el Greco, and
others, for the most part Spanish masters. Twenty-five were
completely ruined.
“_Guipuzcoa._--The civil war in this province has been the cause
and the pretext for the disappearance of many works of art.
‘Since,’ says the report, ‘whilst many have been destroyed on the
one hand, on the other the state of affairs has thrown a shield
over those who have profited by the confusion, and have unjustly
appropriated the property of the state.’
“_Jaen._--The Local Commission of Jaen in the course of nine months
got together five hundred and twenty-three pictures, of which they
reported two hundred and eighty-five as worthless, and placed two
hundred and thirty-eight in the old Jesuit convent. The names of
Murillo, Zurbaran, Alonso Cano, Castillo, Orrente, Melgar, Juan de
Sevilla, Guzman, Coello, Titian, el Greco, and Albano, appear in
the catalogue.
“_Leon._--‘The necessity,’ says the report, ‘of quartering troops
in the various convents of this province, and the scandalous tricks
which we know to have been played with the works of art in the
same, are the causes why the catalogue, which was framed in
September of last year, appeared so imperfect and so scanty, since
the number of objects was reduced to sixty-one pictures and three
pieces of sculpture, deposited in the convent of the so-called
“Monjas Catalinas.”’ No more favorable account seems to have been
received at the time the report was drawn up.
“_Lérida._--Here too the civil war is said to have caused the
disappearance of most of the pictures in the convents; only
eighteen of any merit had been collected in April, 1844, but some
more were known to exist in the Seo de Urgel, where the local
authorities however refused to give them up to the government. The
Commission had not been able to obtain an accurate account even of
the eighteen.
“_Malaga._--A miserable return of six pieces sculpture and four
pictures was all that could be obtained by the Central Commission,
and they attribute this result to ‘the natural indolence and purely
mercantile spirit of that district.’ Probably the facility for
exportation had a good deal to do with the disappearance of the
various works of art which the report affirms to have been once
collected and deposited in various public buildings.”
DON DIEGO VELASQUEZ.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account