Animal intelligence: Experimental studiesThorndike, Edward L. (Edward Lee)
Science
Animal intelligence: Experimental studies
Thorndike, Edward L. (Edward Lee)
Animal intelligence; Psychology, Comparative
INTRODUCTION
The work to be described in this paper is a direct continuation of
the work done by the author in 1897-1898 and described in Monograph
Supplement No. 8 of the _Psychological Review_ under the heading, ‘Animal
Intelligence; an Experimental Study of the Associative Processes in
Animals.’[23] This monograph affords by far the best introduction to the
present discussion, and I shall therefore assume an acquaintance with it
on the part of my readers.
It will be remembered that evidence was there given that ordinary
mammals, barring the primates, did not infer or compare, did not imitate
in the sense of ‘learning to do an act from seeing it done,’ did not
learn various simple acts from being put through them, showed no signs
of having in connection with the bulk of their performances any mental
images. Their method of learning seemed to be the gradual selection of
certain acts in certain situations by reason of the satisfaction they
brought. Quantitative estimates of this gradualness were given for a
number of dogs and cats. Nothing has appeared since the ‘Experimental
Study’ to negate any of these conclusions in the author’s mind. The
work of Kline and Small[24] on rodents shows the same general aspect of
mammalian mentality.
Adult human beings who are not notably deficient in mental functions,
at least all such as psychologists have observed, possess a large stock
of images and memories. The sight of a chair, for example, may call up
in their minds a picture of the person who usually sits in it, or the
sound of his name. The sound of a bell may call up the idea of dinner.
The outside world also is to them in large part a multitude of definite
percepts. They feel the environment as trees, sticks, stones, chairs,
tables, letters, words, etc. I have called such definite presentations
‘free ideas’ to distinguish them from the vague presentations such as
atmospheric pressure, the feeling of malaise, of the position of one’s
body when falling, etc. It is such ‘free ideas’ which compose the
substance of thought and which lead us to perhaps the majority of the
different acts we perform, though we do, of course, react to the vaguer
sort as well. I saw definitely in writing the last sentence the words
‘majority of the different acts’ and thought ‘we perform’ and so wrote
it. I see a bill and so take check book and pen and write. I think of the
cold outside and so put on an overcoat. This mental function ‘having free
ideas,’ gives the possibility of learning to meet situations properly
by thinking about them, by being reminded of some property of the fact
before us or some element therein.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account