Animal intelligence: Experimental studiesThorndike, Edward L. (Edward Lee)
Science
Animal intelligence: Experimental studies
Thorndike, Edward L. (Edward Lee)
Animal intelligence; Psychology, Comparative
In discussing these facts we may first of all clear our way of one
popular explanation, that this learning was due to ‘reasoning.’ If
we use the word reasoning in its technical psychological meaning as
the function of reaching conclusions by the perception of relations,
comparison and inference, if we think of the mental content involved as
feelings of relation, perceptions of similarity, general and abstract
notions and judgments, we find no evidence of reasoning in the behavior
of the monkeys toward the mechanisms used. And this fact nullifies the
arguments for reasoning in their case as it did in the case of the
dogs and cats. The argument that successful dealings with mechanical
contrivances imply that the animals reasoned out the properties of the
mechanisms, is destroyed when we find mere selection from their general
instinctive activities sufficient to cause success with bars, hooks,
loops, etc. There is also in the case of the monkeys, as in that of the
other mammals, positive evidence of the absence of any general function
of reasoning. We shall find that at least very many simple acts were not
learned by the monkeys in spite of their having seen me perform them
again and again; that the same holds true of many simple acts which they
saw other monkeys do, or were put through by me. We shall find that after
having abundant opportunity to realize that one signal meant food at the
bottom of the cage and another none, a monkey would not act from the
obvious inference and consistently stay up or go down as the case might
be, but would make errors such as would be natural if he acted under
the growing influence of an association between sense-impression and
impulse or sense-impression and idea, but quite incomprehensible if he
had compared the two signals and made a definite inference. We shall find
that, after experience with several pairs of signals, the monkeys yet
failed, when a new pair was used, to do the obvious thing to a rational
mind; viz., to compare the two, think which meant food, and act on the
knowledge directly.
TABLE 9
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account