Animal intelligence: Experimental studiesThorndike, Edward L. (Edward Lee)
Science
Animal intelligence: Experimental studies
Thorndike, Edward L. (Edward Lee)
Animal intelligence; Psychology, Comparative
the bar, and the fact that after such tuition he still fails to push or
pull the bar may mean simply that it has not caught his notice. I have,
therefore, preferred in most cases to give the animals only a brief
period of trial to test their ability by their own unaided efforts and
to omit the attempts to test the efficacy of attracting their attention
to the vital point in the mechanism. This makes the results appear less
elegant and definitive but really increases their value for purposes of
interpretation.
The thoughtful reader will not expect from my experiments any perfectly
rigorous demonstration of either the presence or the absence of imitation
of human acts as a means of learning. The general trend of the evidence,
it seems to me, is decidedly towards justifying the hypothesis that the
monkeys did not learn acts from seeing me do them.
I will first describe a sample experiment and then present a summary of
all those made.
On January 12th I put box Epsilon (push down) in No. 3’s cage, the door
of the box being open. I put a bit of food in the box. No. 3 reached
in and took it. This was repeated three times. I then put in a bit of
food and closed the door. No. 3 pulled and bit the box, turned it over,
fingered and bit at the hole where the lever was, but did not succeed
in getting the door open. After ten minutes I took the box out. Later I
took No. 3 out and let him sit on my knees (I sitting on the floor with
the box in front of us). I would then put my hand out toward the box and
when he was looking at it would insert my finger and depress the lever
with as evident a movement as I could. The door, of course, opened, and
No. 3 put his arm in and took the bit of food. I then put in another,
closed the door and depressed the lever as before. No. 3 watched my hand
pretty constantly, as all his experiences with me had made such watching
profitable. After ten such trials he was put back in the cage and the
box put in with a large piece of food in it and its door closed. No. 3
failed in five minutes and the box was taken out. He was shown fifteen
times more and then left to try himself. I tried him for a couple of
minutes under just the same circumstances as existed during the tuition,
_i.e._ he on the floor by me, the box in front. In this trial and in a
five-minute trial inside his cage he failed to open the door or to differ
in any essential respect from his behavior before tuition.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account