QQ (c) (nail chute) | | | | | | 10 | 10 F | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | No. 3, Jan. 15, 1901, | 20 | 11.00 | | No. |Yes. Epsilon (push down) | | 30 F | ? | | | 15 | 10 F | | | | | | | | No. 3, Jan. 16, 1901, | | | | | QQ (e) (hook chute) | 10 | .10 |Dissimilar.| No. | | | .10 | | | | | | | | | | | | | No. 3, Jan. 19, 1901, | 7 | 5 F | | | QQ (ff) (string chute | 8 | 5 F | | | with wire) | 12 | 3.00 |Dissimilar.| No. | | | 5 F | | | | | | | | No. 3, Jan. 22, 1901, | 10 | 5 F | | | WW (bar inside) | |6.00[40]| | | | | | | | | |7.00[40]|Dissimilar.| No. | ========================+======+========+===========+========+====== In only one case (bolt at top) out of eight was there possibly any attempt at the act after he had been put through which had not been made before. The ‘yes or?’ in the table with RR was a case occurring after the imitation of me but before the putting No. 1 through. Out of 6 cases where he had himself failed, No. 3 succeeded (after being put through 113, 23, 20, 10, 10, 20 and 10 times) in 3 cases (chute bar, push down and bar inside). The act was dissimilar in all three cases, bearing absolutely no resemblance in one case. There was no unsuccessful attempt at the act taught him in any of the cases. With the chute he did finger the bar after tuition where he had not done so before, but it was probably an accidental result of his holding his hand out toward it for me to take as he had formed the habit of doing. In the case of box Epsilon (push down), with which he succeeded by pushing his hand in above the lever (an act which though unlike that taught him might be by some considered to be due to an idea gained from the tuition), he failed entirely after further tuition (15 times).