Animal intelligence: Experimental studiesThorndike, Edward L. (Edward Lee)
Science
Animal intelligence: Experimental studies
Thorndike, Edward L. (Edward Lee)
Animal intelligence; Psychology, Comparative
Some of my boxes were such as did give a chance for a complex association
to be formed. Such were G (thumb latch), J (double), K and L (triples)
for the cats, and O (triple) for the dogs. It would be possible for a
cat, after stepping on the platform in K, to notice that the platform was
in a different position, and so feel then a different sense-impression
from before, and thus turn the thing into a serial association. The
cat would then be like a man who on seeing a door should feel only the
impulse to stick the key in the hole, but then, seeing the door plus
a key in the hole, should feel the impulse to turn the key and so on
through. My cats did not give any signs of this, so that with them it
was either a complex association or an irregular happening of the proper
impulses. Probably the same was the case with Dog 1. Cats 10, 11, 12 in L
knew all the movements separately before being experimented on with the
combination. Cats 2, 3, 4 had had some experience of D, which worked by a
string something like the string part of K. The string in K was, however,
quite differently situated and required an altogether different movement
to pull it. Since further No. 2, who had had ten times as much experience
in D as 3 or 4, succeeded no better with the string element of K than
they, it is probable that the experience did not help very much. All else
in all these compound associations was new. At the same time the history
of these animals’ dealings with these boxes would not fairly represent
that of animals without general experience of clawing at all sorts of
loose or shaky things in the inside of a box. These cats had learned
to claw at all sorts of things. The time-curves were taken as in the
formation of the other associations, and, in addition, the order in which
the animal did the several things required was recorded in every trial.
In the case of all the curves, except the latter part of 3 in G, one
notices a very gradual slope and an excessive irregularity in the curve
throughout. Within the limits of the trials given the animals are unable
to form a perfect association and what advancement they make is very
slow. The case of 3 in G is not an exception to this, but a proof of it.
For 3 succeeded in making a perfect association, by accidentally hitting
on a way to turn the compound association into a simple one. He happened
one time to paw down the thumb piece at the same time that his other fore
limb, with which he was holding on between the door and the top of the
box, was pressing against the door. This giving him success he repeated
it in later trials and in a short time had it fixed as an element in a
perfect association. The marked change in his curve, from an irregular
and gradual slope at such a height as displayed a very imperfect
association, to a constant and very slight height, shows precisely the
change from a compound to a simple association.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account