Animal intelligence: Experimental studiesThorndike, Edward L. (Edward Lee)
Science
Animal intelligence: Experimental studies
Thorndike, Edward L. (Edward Lee)
Animal intelligence; Psychology, Comparative
My cats and dogs did not mix up their acts with the wrong
sense-impressions. The chicks that learned the series of twenty-three
associations did not find it a task beyond their powers to retain
them. Several three-day-old chicks, which I caused to learn ten simple
associations in the same day, kept the things apart and on the next
morning went through each act at the proper stimulus. In the hands
of animal trainers some animals get a large number of associations
perfectly in hand. The horse Mascot is claimed to know the meaning of
fifteen hundred signals! He certainly knows a great many, and such as
are naturally difficult of acquisition. It would be an enlightening
investigation if some one could find out just how many associations a
cat or dog could form, if he were carefully and constantly given an
opportunity. The result would probably show that the number was limited
only by the amount of motive available and the time taken to acquire
each. For there is probably nothing in their brain structure which
limits the number of connections that can be formed, or would cause such
connections, as they grew numerous, to become confused.
In their anxiety to credit animals with human powers, the psychologists
have disregarded or belittled, perhaps, the possibilities of the strictly
animal sort of association. They would think it more wonderful that a
horse should respond differently to a lot of different numbers on the
blackboard than that he should infer a consequence from premises. But
if it be made a direct question of pleasure or pain to an animal, he
can associate any number of acts with different stimuli. Only he does
not form any associations until he has to, until the direct benefit is
apparent, and, for his ordinary life, comparatively few are needed.
On the whole our judgment from a comparison of man’s associations with
the brutes’ must be that a man’s are naturally far more delicate,
complex and numerous, and that in as far as the animals attain delicacy,
complexity, or a great number of associations, they do it by methods
which man uses only in a very limited part of the field.
PERMANENCE OF ASSOCIATIONS
Once formed, the connections by which, when an animal feels a certain
sense-impression, he does a certain thing, persist over considerable
intervals of time. With the curves on pages 39 to 58 and 60 to 65 are
given in many instances[17] additional curves showing the animal’s
proficiency after an interval without experience. To these data may be
added the following:—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account