Animal Locomotion; or, walking, swimming, and flying: With a dissertation on aëronauticsPettigrew, James Bell
Science
Animal Locomotion; or, walking, swimming, and flying: With a dissertation on aëronautics
Pettigrew, James Bell
Aeronautics; Animal locomotion
[79] The above observation was made at Carlow on the Barrow in
October 1867, and the account of it is taken from my note-book.
_The Natural Wing, when elevated and depressed, must move
forwards._--It is a condition of natural wings, and of artificial wings
constructed on the principle of living wings, that when forcibly
elevated or depressed, even in a strictly vertical direction, they
inevitably dart forward. This is well shown in fig. 81.
[Illustration: FIG. 81.]
If, for example, the wing is suddenly depressed in _a vertical
direction_, as represented at _a b_, it at once darts downwards and
forwards in a curve to _c_, thus converting the vertical down stroke
into _a down oblique forward stroke_. If, again, the wing be suddenly
elevated in a strictly vertical direction, as at _c d_, the wing as
certainly darts upwards and forwards in a curve to _e_, thus converting
the vertical up stroke into an _upward oblique forward stroke_. The
same thing happens when the wing is depressed from _e_ to _f_, and
elevated from _g_ to _h_. In both cases the wing describes a waved
track, as shown at _e g_, _g i_, which clearly proves that the wing
strikes _downwards and forwards_ during the down stroke, and _upwards
and forwards_ during the up stroke. The wing, in fact, is always
advancing; its under surface attacking the air like a boy’s kite.
If, on the other hand, the wing be forcibly depressed, as indicated
by the heavy waved line _a c_, and left to itself, it will as surely
rise again and describe a waved track, as shown at _c e_. This it
does by rotating on its long axis, and in virtue of its flexibility
and elasticity, aided by the recoil obtained from the air. In other
words, it is not necessary to elevate the wing forcibly in the
direction _c d_ to obtain the upward and forward movement _c e_. One
single impulse communicated at _a_ causes the wing to travel to _e_,
and a second impulse communicated at _e_ causes it to travel to _i_.
It follows from this that a series of vigorous down impulses would,
_if a certain interval were allowed to elapse between them_, beget a
corresponding series of up impulses, in accordance with the law of
action and reaction; the wing and the air under these circumstances
being alternately active and passive. I say if a certain interval
were allowed to elapse between every two down strokes, but this is
practically impossible, as the wing is driven with such velocity
that there is positively no time to waste in waiting for the purely
mechanical ascent of the wing. That the ascent of the pinion is not,
and ought not to be entirely due to the reaction of the air, is proved
by the fact that in flying creatures (certainly in the bat and bird)
there are distinct elevator muscles and elastic ligaments delegated to
the performance of this function. The reaction of the air is therefore
only one of the forces employed in elevating the wing; the others, as
I shall show presently, are vital and vito-mechanical in their nature.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account