Duckbills, except when in their burrows, pass the greater portion of
their time in the water, selecting quiet pools for their favourite
haunts. In such situations they may be seen on a still evening floating
and diving, and looking more like bottles in the water than anything
else. They obtain their food chiefly by probing in the mud with their
duck-like beaks. The dwelling-chamber of the burrow is situated in the
bank above the water level, but its entrance is below the surface,
although there is also an exit on the land. In the pairing-season the
males, which are armed with a poison-bearing spine on the inside of
each hind-leg, fight fiercely among themselves.
The duckbill, of which there is but a single species, is absolutely
confined to southern and eastern Australia and Tasmania; and its
nearest living relative is the echidna, of which a picture and notice
follow.
THE SPINY ANT-EATER OR ECHIDNA
(_Tachyglossus aculeatus_)
No one who looked at the portrait of the spiny ant-eater for the
first time, and had no knowledge of its anatomy or history, would
be likely to guess that it was a near relative of the duckbill. But
in natural history, when we have to deal with members of different
groups, externals count for very little, and all depends upon internal
organisation. In the latter respect the echidnas, for there is more
than one species, resemble in all essential features the duckbill,
as they do in laying hard-shelled eggs, from which the young are
eventually hatched. The single egg of the echidna, in place of being
laid in a burrow, is, however, carried about by the female in a pouch
developed for the purpose on the under side of her body shortly before
the egg is laid; and in this same temporary pouch the young is likewise
nurtured during the earlier stages of its existence.
The duckbill and the echidna afford an excellent example of the
diversity of appearance produced in animals more or less nearly related
to each other by specialisation and adaptation to totally distinct
modes of life. In the duckbill the specialisation and adaptation are
for an aquatic existence; in the echidna they are for a burrowing,
terrestrial life and a diet of ants.
To an ant-eater teeth of any kind would be not only useless, but an
actual hindrance, and they have accordingly been discarded, while the
muzzle has been prolonged into a decidedly bird-like beak. In this
respect the echidna much resembles the great South American ant-eater,
which belongs to a totally different group of mammals.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account