Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan, v. 1 of 3: or the Central and Western Rajput States of IndiaTod, James
History
Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan, v. 1 of 3: or the Central and Western Rajput States of India
Tod, James
Rajasthan (India) -- History; Rajput (Indic people) -- History
“There were eight councillors; two chosen priests profound in the law,
besides another inferior council of six. Of subdued appetites,
disinterested, forbearing, pleasant, patient; not avaricious; well
acquainted with their duties and popular customs; attentive to the
army, the treasury; impartially awarding punishment even on their own
sons; never oppressing even an enemy; not arrogant; comely in dress;
never confident about doubtful matters; devoted to the sovereign.”
Footnote 2.4.2:
Mithila, the modern Tirhut in Bengal [including the modern districts
of Darbhanga, Champāran, and Muzaffarpur].
Footnote 2.4.3:
Kusadhwaja, father of Sita (spouse of Rama), is also called Janaka; a
name common in this line, and borne by the third prince in succession
after Suvarna Roma, the ‘golden-haired’ chief Mithila.
Footnote 2.4.4:
[Rohtās in the modern Shāhābād district; Champapura in Bhāgalpur.]
Footnote 2.4.5:
Familiarly designated as Sahasra Bahu ki Basti, or ‘the town of the
thousand-armed.’ [In Indore State (_IGI_, xvii. 8).]
Footnote 2.4.6:
The Haihaya race, of the line of Budha, may claim affinity with the
Chinese race which first gave monarchs to China [?].
Footnote 2.4.7:
Of this I have heard the most romantic proofs in very recent times.
Footnote 2.4.8:
Puru became the patronymic of this branch of the Lunar race. Of this
Alexander’s historians made Porus. The Suraseni of Methoras
(descendants of the Sursen of Mathura) were all Purus, the Prasioi of
Megasthenes [see p. 37, n.]. Allahabad yet retains its Hindu name of
Prayag, pronounced Prag.
Footnote 2.4.9:
The Hares. Sesodia is said to have the same derivation. [From Sesoda
in Mewār.]
Footnote 2.4.10:
The princes of Ranthambhor, expelled by Prithwiraja of Delhi, were of
this race.
Footnote 2.4.11:
The modern Chanderi [in the Gwalior State, _IGI_, x. 163 f.] is said
to be this capital, and one of the few to which no Englishman has
obtained entrance, though I tried hard in 1807. Doubtless it would
afford food for curiosity; for, being out of the path of armies in the
days of conquest and revolution, it may, and I believe does, retain
much worthy of research. [The capital of the Chedi or Kalachuri
dynasty was Tripura or Karanbel, near Jabalpur (_IGI_, x. 12).]
Footnote 2.4.12:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account