A prince of Bundi had married a Rajputni of the Malani tribe, a name now unknown: but a bard repeating the ‘gotracharya,’ it was discovered to have been about eight centuries before a ramification (sakha) of the Chauhan, to which the Hara of Bundi belonged—divorce and expiatory rites, with great unhappiness, were the consequences. What a contrast to the unhallowed doctrines of polyandry, as mentioned amongst the Pandavas, the Scythic nations, the inhabitants of Sirmor of the present day, and pertaining even to Britain in the days of Caesar!—“Uxores habent deni duodenique inter se communes,” says that accurate writer, speaking of the natives of this island; “et maximè fratres cum fratribus, parentesque cum liberis: sed si qui sint ex his nati, eorum habentur liberi, quo primum virgo quaeque deducta est.” Footnote 2.7.7: _Aparam sakham_, ‘of innumerable branches,’ is inscribed on an ancient tablet of the Guhilot race. Footnote 2.7.8: _Got_, _khanp_, denote a clan; its subdivisions have the patronymic terminating with the syllable ‘_ot_,’ ‘_awat_,’ ‘_sot_,’ in the use of which euphony alone is their guide: thus, _Saktawat_, ‘sons of Sakta’; _Kurmasot_, ‘of Kurma’; _Mairawat_, or _mairot_, mountaineers, ‘sons of the mountains.’ Such is the Greek _Mainote_, from _maina_, a mountain, in the ancient Albanian dialect, of eastern origin. Footnote 2.7.9: From _agni_ (_qu._ _ignis?_) ‘fire,’ the sons of Vulcan, as the others of Sol and Luna, or Lunus, to change the sex of the parent of the Indu (moon) race. Footnote 2.7.10: _Vansavali, Suryavansi Rajkuli Rana Chitor ka Dhani, Chhattis Kuli Sengar._—MSS. from the Rana’s library, entitled _Khuman Raesa_. Footnote 2.7.11: Always conjoined with Vairat—‘Vijayapur Vairatgarh.’ [Vairāt forty-one miles north of Jaipur city. The reference in the text is merely a bardic fable, there being no connexion between Vijaya and this place (_ASR_, ii. 249).] Footnote 2.7.12: A.D. 319. The inscription recording this, as well as others relating to Valabhi and this era, I discovered in Saurashtra, as well as the site of this ancient capital, occupying the position of ‘Byzantium’ in Ptolemy’s geography of India. They will be given in the _Transactions_ of the Royal Asiatic Society. [The Valabhi agrees with the Gupta era (Smith, _EHI_, 20).] Footnote 2.7.13: Anandpur Ahar, or ‘Ahar the city of repose.’ By the tide of events, the family was destined to fix their last capital, Udaipur, near Ahar. Footnote 2.7.14: The middle of the eighth century. Footnote 2.7.15: [Or Maurya], a Pramara prince. Footnote 2.7.16: [For a different list, see _Census Report, Rajputana, 1911_, i. 256.] Footnote 2.7.17: The place where they found refuge was in the cluster of hills still called _Yadu ka dang_, ‘the Yadu hills’:—the _Joudes_ of Rennell’s geography [see p. 75 above]. Footnote 2.7.18: