Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan, v. 1 of 3: or the Central and Western Rajput States of IndiaTod, James
History
Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan, v. 1 of 3: or the Central and Western Rajput States of India
Tod, James
Rajasthan (India) -- History; Rajput (Indic people) -- History
Abulghazi [_Hist. of the Turks, Moguls, and Tartars_, 1730, i. 5 f.]
says, when Noah left the ark he divided the earth amongst his three
sons: Shem had Iran: Japhet, the country of ‘Kuttup Shamach,’ the name
of the regions between the Caspian Sea and India. There he lived two
hundred and fifty years. He left eight sons, of whom Turk was the
elder and the seventh Camari, supposed the Gomer of Scripture. Turk
had four sons; the eldest of whom was Taunak, the fourth from whom was
Mogul, a corruption of Mongol, signifying _sad_, whose successors made
the Jaxartes their winter abode. [The word means ‘brave’ (Howorth,
_Hist. of the Mongols_, i. 27).] Under his reign no trace of the true
religion remained: idolatry reigned everywhere. Aghuz Khan succeeded.
The ancient Cimbri, who went west with Odin’s horde of Jats, Chattis,
and Su, were probably the tribes descended from Camari, the son of
Turk.
Footnote 2.7.102:
Tacash continued to be a proper name with the great Khans of Khārizm
(Chorasmia) until they adopted the faith of Muhammad. The father of
Jalal, the foe of Jenghiz Khan, was named Tacash. Tashkent on the
Jaxartes, the capital of Turkistan, may be derived from the name of
the race. Bayer says, “Tocharistan was the region of the Tochari, who
were the ancient Τώχαροι (Tochari), or Τάχαροι (Tacharoi).” Ammianus
Marcellinus says, “many nations obey the Bactrians, whom the Tochari
surpass” (_Hist. Reg. Bact._ p. 7).
Footnote 2.7.103:
This singular race, the Tajiks, are repeatedly mentioned by Mr.
Elphinstone in his admirable account of the kingdom of Kabul. They are
also particularly noticed as monopolising the commercial transactions
of the kingdom of Bokhara, in that interesting work, _Voyage
d’Orenbourg à Bokhara_, the map accompanying which, for the first
time, lays down authentically the sources and course of the Oxus and
Jaxartes. [The term Tājik means the settled population, as opposed to
the Turks or tent-dwellers. It is the same word as Tāzi, ‘Arab,’ still
surviving in the name of the Persian greyhound, which was apparently
introduced by the Arabs. Sykes (_Hist. of Persia_, ii. 153, note) and
Skrine-Ross (_The Heart of Asia_, 3, 364 note) state that the Tājiks
represent the Iranian branch of the Aryans.]
Footnote 2.7.104:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account