Footnote 2.7.145: [For the island of Piram in Ahmadabad district see _IGI_, xx. 149 f., and for the tradition Wilberforce-Bell, _op. cit._ 71 f.; _BG_, iv. 348, viii. 114.] Footnote 2.7.146: [The ancient Nandapadra in Rājpīpla, Bombay (_IGI_, xviii. 361; _BG_, i. Part ii. 314).] Footnote 2.7.147: _Sarwaiya Khatri tain sar._ Footnote 2.7.148: _Su_, as before observed, is a distinctive prefix, meaning ‘excellent.’ [The derivation is impossible. Lāta was S. Gujarāt.] Footnote 2.7.149: [For the Dābhi tribe, see _IA_, iii. 69 ff., 193 f.; Forbes, _Rāsmāla_, 237 f.] Footnote 2.7.150: In 1807 the author passed through this territory, in a solitary ramble to explore these parts, then little known; and though but a young _Sub._, was courteously received and entertained both at Baroda and Sheopur. In 1809 he again entered the country under very different circumstances, in the suite of the British envoy with Sindhia’s court, and had the grief to witness the operations against Sheopur, and its fall, unable to aid his friends. The Gaur prince had laid aside the martial virtues. He became a zealot in the worship of Vishnu, left off animal food, was continually dancing before the image of the god, and was far more conversant in the mystical poetry of Krishna and his beloved Radha than in the martial song of the bard. His name was Radhikadas, ‘the slave of Radha’; and, as far as he is personally concerned, we might cease to lament that he was the last of his race. Footnote 2.7.151: [Only two sub-clans are named in _Rajputana Census Report, 1911_, i. 255. Gaur Rājputs are numerous in the United Provinces, and the Gaur Brāhmans of Jaipur represent a foreign tribe merged into Hindu society (_IA_, xi. 22). They can have no connexion with the Pāla or Sena dynasty of Bengal (Smith, _EHI_, 397 ff.).] Footnote 2.7.152: See _Transactions of Royal Asiatic Society_, vol. i. p. 133. [They are found in the Upper Ganges-Jumna Duab, and are Musalmāns.] Footnote 2.7.153: Benares. Footnote 2.7.154: [For the Gaharwār, see Crooke, _Tribes and Castes N.W.P. and Oudh_, ii. 32 ff., and for the Gaharwār dynasty of Kanauj (Smith, _EHI_, 384 ff.).] Footnote 2.7.155: Slain at the instigation of Prince Salim, son of Akbar, afterwards the emperor Jahangir. See this incident stated in the emperor’s own _Commentaries_ [_Āīn_, i. Introd. xxiv. ff.]. Footnote 2.7.156: [For Subhkaran Singh, see Manucci (i. 270, 272). Dalpat was one of his patients (_Ibid._ ii. 298).] Footnote 2.7.157: