Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan, v. 1 of 3: or the Central and Western Rajput States of IndiaTod, James
History
Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan, v. 1 of 3: or the Central and Western Rajput States of India
Tod, James
Rajasthan (India) -- History; Rajput (Indic people) -- History
=Khar-Lakar.=—The composition for ‘wood and forage’ afforded a
considerable supply. When the princes of Mewar were oftener in the
tented field than in the palace, combating for their preservation, it
was the duty of every individual to store up wood and forage for the
supply of the prince’s army. What originated in necessity was converted
into an abuse and annual demand. The towns also supplied a certain
portion of provisions; where the prince halted for the day these were
levied on the community; a goat or sheep from the shepherd, milk and
flour from the farmer. The maintenance of these customs is observable in
taxes, for the origin of which it is impossible to assign a reason
without going into the history of the period; they scarcely recollect
the source of some of these themselves. They are akin to those known
under the feudal tenures of France, arising from exactly the same
causes, and commuted for money payments; such as the _droit de giste et
de chevauche_.[3.1.48] Many also originated in the perambulations of
these princes to visit their domains;[3.1.49] a black year in the
calendar to the chief and the subject. When he honoured the chief by a
visit, he had to present horses and arms, and to entertain his prince,
in all which honours the cultivators and merchants had to share. The
duties on the sale of spirits, opium, tobacco, and even to a share of
the garden-stuff, affords also modes of supply [145].[3.1.50]
-----
Footnote 3.1.1:
_Miscellaneous Works_, vol. iii.
Footnote 3.1.2:
Hallam’s _Middle Ages_.
Footnote 3.1.3:
It is a high gratification to be supported by such authority as M. St.
Martin, who, in his _Discours sur l’Origine et l’Histoire des
Arsacides_, thus speaks of the system of government termed feudal,
which I contend exists amongst the Rajputs: "On pense assez
généralement que cette sorte de gouvernement qui dominait il y a
quelques siècles, et qu’on appelle _système féodal_, était
particulière à l’Europe, et que c’est dans les forêts de la Germanie
qu’il faut en chercher l’origine. Cependant, si au lieu d’admettre les
faits sans les discuter, comme il arrive trop souvent, on examinait un
peu cette opinion, elle disparaitrait devant la critique, ou du moins
elle se modifierait singulièrement; et l’on verrait que, si c’est des
forêts de la Germanie que nous avons tiré le gouvernement féodal, il
n’en est certainement pas originaire. Si l’on veut comparer l’Europe,
telle qu’elle était au xii^e siècle, avec la monarchie fondée en Asie
par les Arsacides trois siècles avant notre ère, partout on verra des
institutions et des usages pareils. On y trouvera les mêmes dignités,
et jusqu’aux mêmes titres, etc., etc. Boire, chasser, combattre, faire
et défaire des rois, c’étaient là les nobles occupations d’un Parthe"
(_Journal Asiatique_, vol. i. p. 65). It is nearly so with the Rajput.
Footnote 3.1.4:
Gibbon, _Miscell._ vol. iii. Du gouvernement féodal.
Footnote 3.1.5:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account