Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan, v. 1 of 3: or the Central and Western Rajput States of IndiaTod, James
History
Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan, v. 1 of 3: or the Central and Western Rajput States of India
Tod, James
Rajasthan (India) -- History; Rajput (Indic people) -- History
The wild fable which envelops or adorns the cradle of every
illustrious family is not easily disentangled. The bards weave the web
with skill, and it clings like ivy round each modern branch, obscuring
the aged stem, in the time-worn branches of which monsters and
demi-gods are perched, whose claims of affinity are held in high
estimation by these ‘children of the sun,’ who would deem it criminal
to doubt that the loin-robe (_dhoti_) of their great founder, Bapa
Rawal, was less than five hundred cubits in circumference, that his
two-edged sword (_khanda_), the gift of the Hindu Proserpine, weighed
an ounce less than sixty-four pounds, or that he was an inch under
twenty feet in height.
Footnote 4.1.23:
[Vijayapur has been doubtfully identified with Bījapur in the
Ahmadābād district (_BG_, i. Part i. 110).]
Footnote 4.1.24:
Presented to the Royal Asiatic Society of London.
Footnote 4.1.25:
Sorath or Saurashtra.
Footnote 4.1.26:
The ‘lord of Bal.’
Footnote 4.1.27:
Mārwār.
Footnote 4.1.28:
[The date of the fall of Valabhi is very uncertain (Smith, _EHI_, 315,
note). It is said to have been destroyed in the reign of Sīlāditya
VI., the last of the dynasty, about A.D. 776 (Duff, _Chronology of
India_, 31, 67, 308).]
Footnote 4.1.29:
[There is possibly a confusion with the Soras of Aelian (xv. 8) which
has been identified by Caldwell (_Dravidian Grammar_, 17) with the
Σῶραι of Ptolemy, and with the Chola kingdom of Southern India.
Surāshtra or Saurāshtra, ‘land of the Sus,’ was afterwards
Sanskritized into ‘goodly country’ (Monier Williams, _Skt. Dict._
s.v.; _BG_, i. Part i. 6).]
Footnote 4.1.30:
Gaini, or Gajni, is one of the ancient names of Cambay (the port of
Valabhipura), the ruins of which are about three miles from the modern
city. Other sources indicate that these princes held possessions in
the southern continent of India, as well as in the Saurashtra
peninsula. Talatalpur Patan, on the Godavari, is mentioned, which
tradition asserts to be the city of Deogir; but which, after many
years’ research, I discovered in Saurashtra, it being one of the
ancient names of Kandala. In after times, when succeeding dynasties
held the title of Balakarae, though the capital was removed inland to
Anhilwara Patan, they still held possession of the western shore, and
Cambay continued the chief port. [For the identification of Gajni with
Cambay see _IA_, iv. 147; _BG_, vi. 213 note. The site of Devagiri has
been identified with Daulatābād (_BG_, i. Part ii. 136; Beal,
_Buddhist Records of the Western World_, ii. 255, note).]
Footnote 4.1.31:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account