Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan, v. 1 of 3: or the Central and Western Rajput States of IndiaTod, James
History
Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan, v. 1 of 3: or the Central and Western Rajput States of India
Tod, James
Rajasthan (India) -- History; Rajput (Indic people) -- History
[Recent inquiries identify Bappa, whose name is merely a title, with
either Mahendrāji ii. or Kālbhoja, early chiefs of Mewār (Erskine ii.
B. 8). It has been suggested that his legend is mixed up with that of
Bappa or Saila of Valabhi, the story of his retreat to Irān
representing the latter being carried as a captive to Mansūra on the
fall of Valabhi or Gandhār (_BG_, i. Part i. 94, note 2). In any case,
the whole story is mere legend, a tale like that of the mysterious
disappearance of Romulus and other kings (Sir J. Frazer, _Lectures on
the Early History of the Kingship_, 269 ff.). A similar tale is told
of Rāna Uda in later Mewār history.]
Footnote 4.2.29:
_Vide_ Appendix, Translation, No. II.
Footnote 4.2.30:
See Translation, No. III.
Footnote 4.2.31:
[The Valabhi era begins in A.D. 318-19.]
Footnote 4.2.32:
This will make Bappa’s attainment of Chitor fifteen years posterior to
Muhammad bin Kasim’s invasion. I have observed generally a discrepancy
of ten years between the Samvat and Hegira; the Hegira reckoned from
the sixteenth year of Muhammad’s mission, and would if employed
reconcile this difficulty. [The traditional dates are untrustworthy,
being based on a confused reminiscence of Valabhi history (_IA_, xv.
275). A list of the chiefs of Mewār, with the dates as far as can be
ascertained, is given by Erskine (ii. B. 8 ff.).]
Footnote 4.2.33:
See Translation of Inscription, No. IV.
Footnote 4.2.34:
A.D. 713, or S. 769: the Inscription 770 of Man Mori, against whom
came the ‘barbarian.’
Footnote 4.2.35:
I was informed by a friend, who had seen the papers of Captain
Macmurdo, that he had a notice of Kasim’s having penetrated to
Dungarpur. Had this gentleman lived, he would have thrown much light
on these Western antiquities. [Muhammad bin Kāsim does not seem to
have attacked Ajmer: the place was not founded till A.D. 1000 (Watson,
_Gazetteer_, i. A. 9).]
Footnote 4.2.36:
By an orthographical error, the modern Hindu, ignorant of Debal, has
written Delhi. But there was no lord of Delhi at this time: he is
styled Dahir, Despat (lord) of Debal, from _des_, ‘a country,’ and
_pat_, ‘the head.’
Footnote 4.2.37:
_Āīn_, ii. 344 f.
Footnote 4.2.38:
[The dates are open to much question. It is known from inscriptions
that Sakti Kumār was alive in A.D. 977.]
-----
CHAPTER 3
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account