Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan, v. 2 of 3: or the Central and Western Rajput States of IndiaTod, James
History
Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan, v. 2 of 3: or the Central and Western Rajput States of India
Tod, James
Rajasthan (India) -- History; Rajput (Indic people) -- History
These people assert their Coptic origin: being driven from Egypt by
one of the Pharaohs, they wandered eastwards till they arrived under
that peak of the mountains west of the Indus called Sulaiman-i-koh, or
‘Hill of Solomon,’ where they halted. Others draw their descent from
the lost tribes. They are a very marked race, and as unsettled as
their forefathers, serving everywhere. They are fine gallant men, and,
when managed by such officers as Skinner, make excellent and orderly
soldiers; but they evince great contempt for the eaters of swine, who
are their abomination. [The Rohillas, ‘Highlanders,’ are a Pathān
tribe which occupied Rohilkhand after the death of Aurangzeb, A.D.
1707 (Crooke, _Tribes and Castes N.W.P. and Oudh_, iv. 165 f.).]
Footnote 4.25.30:
From the ruins of its temples, remnants of Takshak architecture, the
amateur might speedily fill a portfolio. This tract abounds with
romantic scenery: Rajmahall on the Banas, Gokaran, and many others.
Herbert calls Chitor the abode of Taxiles, the ally of Alexander. The
Taks were all of the race of Puru, so that Porus is a generic, not a
proper name. This Taksilanagar has been a large city. We owe thanks to
the Emperor Babur, who has given us the position of the city of
Taxiles, where Alexander left it, west of the Indus. [The Tāk tribe
had no connexion with Chitor.]
Footnote 4.25.31:
See p. 344 [Vol. I.].
Footnote 4.25.32:
[The Muharram festival.]
Footnote 4.25.33:
[Ahadi, ‘single, alone,’ like our warrant-officer, a gentleman trooper
in the Mughal service, so called because they offered their services
singly, and did not attach themselves to any chief (_Āīn_, i. 20,
note; Irvine, _Army of the Indian Moghuls_, 43).]
Footnote 4.25.34:
[This is the Rājput story which lacks confirmation from Muhammadan
sources. The captive may have been Ghiyāsū-d-dīn of Mālwa, or Muzaffar
Shāh of Gujarāt; but it is probably fiction invented by the Mewār
bards (Erskine ii. A. 18).]
Footnote 4.25.35:
See Annals, p. 353.
Footnote 4.5.36:
The bar or banyan tree, _Ficus Indica_.
-----
CHAPTER 26
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account