Rupees. Lachhman Singh, of Sikar, including Khandela 800,000 Abhai Singh, of Khetri, including Kotputli, given by Lord Lake 600,000 Shyam Singh, of Baswa, including his brother Ranjit’s share of 40,000 (whom he killed) 190,000 Gyan Singh, of Nawalgarh, including Mandao, each fifty villages 70,000 Lachhman Singh, Mendsar, the chief sub-infeudation of Nawalgarh 30,000 Tain and its lands, divided amongst the twenty-seven great-grandsons of Zorawar Singh, eldest son of Sadhu 100,000 Udaipurvati 100,000 Manoharpur[9.7.25] 30,000 Larkhanis 100,000 Harramjis 40,000 Girdharpotas 40,000 Smaller estates 200,000 ————- 2,300,000 ————— [429.] The tribute established by Jaipur is as follows:— Rupees. Sadhanis 200,000 Fatehpur 64,000 Udaipur and Babhai 22,000 Kasli 4,000 ———— 350,000 ———— Thus, supposing the revenues, as stated, at twenty-three lakhs, to be near the truth, and the tribute at three and a half, it would be an assessment of one-seventh of the whole, which is a fair proportion, and a measure of justice which the British Government would do well to imitate. ----- Footnote 9.7.1: _Dhūs_ is an expedient to hasten the compliance of a demand from a dependent. A party of horse proceeds to the township, and are commanded to receive so much per day till the exaction is complied with. If the _dhūs_ is refused, it is considered tantamount to an appeal to arms. [_Dhūsnā_ means ‘to butt like an ox,’ hence ‘to coerce.’] Footnote 9.7.2: