──────────────────┬──────────────┬──────────┬─────────────────┬─────────┬─────── Sons of │Names of │Names of │Present Chiefs. │Revenues.│Personal Prithiraj. │Families. │Fiefs. │ │ │ Quotas. ──────────────────┼──────────────┼──────────┼─────────────────┼────────┼──────── 1. Chhattarbhuj │Chhattarbhujot│Pinar and │ │ │ │ │Bhagru │Bagh Singh │ 18,000│ 28 2. Kalyan │Kalyanot │Lotwara │Ganga Singh │ 25,000│ 47 3. Nathu │Nathawat │Chaumun │Kishan Singh │ 115,000│ 205 4. Balbhadar │Balbhadarot │Achrol │Kaim Singh │ 28,850│ 57 5. Jagmall his ┐│ │ │ │ │ son Khangar ┘│Khangarot │Thodri │Prithi Singh │ 25,000│ 40 6. Sultan │Sultanot │Chandsar │ — │ —│ — 7. Pachain │Pachainot │Sambra │Sali Singh │ 17,700│ 32 8. — │Gugawat │Dhuni │Rao Chand Singh │ 70,000│ 88 9. Kaim │Kumbhani │Banskoh │Padam Singh │ 21,535│ 31 10. Kumbha │Kumbhawat │Mahar │Rawat Sarup Singh│ 27,538│ 45 11. Surat │Sheobaranpota │Nindar │Rawat Hari Singh │ 10,000│ 19 12. Banbir │Banbirpota │Balkoh │Sarup Singh │ 19,000│ 35 ──────────────────┴──────────────┴──────────┴─────────────────┴────────┴──────── It will be remarked that the estates of these, the chief vassals of Amber, are, with the exception of two, far inferior in value to those of the sixteen great chiefs of Mewar, or the eight of Marwar; and a detailed list of all the inferior feudatories of each Kothri, or clan, would show that many of them have estates greater than those of their leaders: for instance, Kishan Singh of Chaumun has upwards of a lakh, while Beri Sal of Samod, the head of the clan (Nathawat), has only forty thousand; again, the chief of Balaheri holds an estate of thirty-five thousand, while that of the head of his clan is but twenty-five thousand. The representative of the Sheobaranpotas has an estate of only ten thousand, while the junior branch of Gura has thirty-six thousand. Again, the chief of the Khangarots has but twenty-five thousand, while no less than three junior branches hold lands to double that amount; and the inferior of the Balbhadarots holds upwards of a lakh, while the superior of Achrol has not a third of this rental. The favour of the prince, the turbulence or talents of individuals, have caused these inequalities; but, however disproportioned the gifts of fortune, the attribute of honour always remains with the lineal descendant and representative of the original fief.