Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan, v. 3 of 3: or the Central and Western Rajput States of IndiaTod, James
History
Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan, v. 3 of 3: or the Central and Western Rajput States of India
Tod, James
Rajasthan (India) -- History; Rajput (Indic people) -- History
_Ummeda_, ‘hope’; _Singh_, ‘a lion.’
Footnote 10.4.7:
[On the Nerbudda as a barrier see Vol. II. p. 971.]
Footnote 10.4.8:
[The Holkar family belonged to the Dhangar, or Marātha shepherd caste,
taking their name from the village of Hol on the Nīra River in Poona
District (Grant Duff 212; _BG_, xviii. Part ii. 244).]
Footnote 10.4.9:
See Annals of Mewar, Vol. I. p. 495.
Footnote 10.4.10:
[10 miles S. of Jaipur city.]
Footnote 10.4.11:
As in those days when Mahratta spoliation commenced, a joint-stock
purse was made for all such acquisitions, so Patan was divided into
shares, of which the Peshwa had one, and Sindhia another; but the
Peshwa’s share remained nominal, and the revenue was carried to
account by Holkar for the services of the Poona State. In the general
pacification of A.D. 1817, this long-lost and much-cherished district
was once more incorporated with Bundi, to the unspeakable gratitude
and joy of its prince and people. In effecting this for the grandson
of Ummeda, the Author secured for himself a gratification scarcely
less than his.
Footnote 10.4.12:
[_Āīn_, ii. 102, 274 f. Jarrett writes Sūi Sūpar or Sūi Sopar.]
Footnote 10.4.13:
[_Āīn_, ii. 132 f.]
Footnote 10.4.14:
The universal arbitrator, Zalim Singh of Kotah, having undertaken to
satisfy them, and save them from the annual visitations of the Jaipur
troops, withdrew the proper allegiance of Indargarh, Balwan, and
Antardah to himself. The British government, in ignorance of these
historical facts, and not desirous to disturb the existing state of
things, were averse to hear the Bundi claims for the restoration of
her proper authority over these her chief vassals. With all his
gratitude for the restoration of his political existence, the brave
and good Bishan Singh could not suppress a sigh when the author said
that Lord Hastings refused to go into the question of the Kothris, who
had thus transferred their allegiance to Zalim Singh of Kotah. In
their usual metaphorical style, he said, with great emphasis and
sorrow, “My wings remain broken.” It would be a matter of no
difficulty to negotiate the claims of Jaipur, and cause the regent of
Kotah to forgo his interposition, which would be attended with no loss
of any kind to him, but would afford unspeakable benefit and pride to
Bundi, which has well deserved the boon at our hands.
Footnote 10.4.15:
[About 30 miles N.E. of Būndi city: for Bijaiseni Māta see Vol. II. p.
1193.]
Footnote 10.4.16:
The laws of revenge are dreadfully absolute: had the sons of Deo Singh
survived, the feud upon their liege lord would have been entailed with
their estate. It is a nice point for a subject to balance between
fidelity to his prince, and a father’s feud, _bap ka vair_.
Footnote 10.4.17:
The queens’ apartments.
Footnote 10.4.18:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account