Anomalies of the English lawChester, S. Beach (Samuel Beach)
History
Anomalies of the English law
Chester, S. Beach (Samuel Beach)
Law; Law -- Great Britain -- History
Suicide is not always incomprehensible, though the coroner’s jury,
with its constant verdict, “during temporary insanity,” would seem to
make it so. There are plenty of people afflicted by disease, medical
men among them, who cut their throats or shoot themselves in desperate
resignation. For purposes of convenience, they are described as of
unsound mind by the considerate jury. Admittedly, an individual who
takes his own life is, _primâ facie_, unbalanced--the act indicates it.
Then, too, physical disease, which has preyed upon a man’s health until
his judgment has become warped, produces a form of _quasi_-insanity.
The suicide verdict, “whilst of unsound mind,” may also be agreeable
to surviving relatives and persons with claims against insurance
companies, but, strictly speaking, its accuracy is generally doubtful,
unless a “warped” mental state, hysteria in women, and the product of
the goadings of misfortune, are symptoms of definite insanity. If this
is so, there are few people in the land who approximate “sanity.” Of
course, in subjects who advance to the length of suicide the defects
specified have reached the stage of personal dominion, or, under
another name, _idée fixe_, in an acute form. This may technically
justify the insanity verdict, but it is questionable whether anything
else would, if one makes allowance for class and ignorance.
By the same process, the man who is goaded into theft by sheer hunger
must likewise be insane. His misfortunes have produced the hunger and
the hunger the theft. Thus desperation is often forced upon a man by
want of funds, something which means prospective, if not immediate,
hunger, and the sense of desperation in its most active state brings
about suicide. Whitaker Wright, the convicted felon, committed suicide
to escape a term of penal servitude. He had a reasonable, if not a
justifiable, motive for his act. So far as one remembers, off-hand, no
“temporary insanity” verdict was recorded in his case. Its balsamic
effect is, however, demanded in countless instances where suicides
have been prompted by equally explainable motives. Altogether, the
coroner’s jury’s verdict, of “suicide whilst of unsound mind,” is
generally inconsistent with the actual facts which led to the act of
self-destruction.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account