Anomalies of the English lawChester, S. Beach (Samuel Beach)
History
Anomalies of the English law
Chester, S. Beach (Samuel Beach)
Law; Law -- Great Britain -- History
The girl could speak no English and her character was not
self-assertive or strong. She knew nothing about French consuls or the
English police, and, then, too, her ordinary wearing apparel had been
taken from her by _B_. She, therefore, found herself on this first
occasion, in the brightly-lighted promenade of a “music hall,” with
many well-dressed men and women in her immediate vicinity. _B_ was
near at hand to keep a watchful eye upon her. A patron of the place,
one who was fluent with his French, soon made off with her to the
flat in Oxford Street, to which he had been directed by _B_. (_A_ was
herself incapable of supplying the address to the cabman). The girl
then explained that she had had her ordinary clothes taken from her
by _B_, that _B_ kept a man in the background, and that she, _A_, was
entirely helpless. At a subsequent meeting, _A_ explained that _B_ took
possession of about forty pounds a week, from her, and that the pretext
was that it was being banked! The only clothes to which she, _A_, had
access were evening gowns; she was kept without money, too, under
constant surveillance, amid conditions which she did not like. The
final scene was enacted a few months later, when the person, to whom
_A_ had confided her story, went to the flat and found her missing. Her
place had been filled by a newly-arrived _girl of fifteen_, procured
by the same process from a Paris shop. On persistent enquiry, _A_ was
found in another room suffering from the consequences of an illegal
operation, which had been forced upon her by the joint efforts of _B_
and the male director of affairs.
A maximum penalty of twelve months’ hard labour for a scoundrel of the
stamp of _B’s_ “lover” is most disproportionate to the offence. Of
course, such a man would be liable to a greater penalty, if a girl of
fifteen years of age were brought into the case. But on the other facts
alone, the law should be less merciful.
Section 10, of the Morality Bill, is worth transcribing in full.
“(1) If any male person shall have connection with a woman who is to
his knowledge his granddaughter, sister, daughter, niece, or mother,
he shall be guilty of felony, and shall be liable upon conviction on
indictment to be imprisoned, with or without hard labour, for any term
not exceeding two years, or be kept in penal servitude for any term not
less than three years and not exceeding seven years: Provided that if
it is alleged in the indictment and proved that the girl was, at the
time of the commission of the offence, under the age of sixteen years,
the maximum term of penal servitude which the court may inflict shall
be ten years.
“(2) If any male person shall attempt to have connection with a woman
who is to his knowledge his granddaughter, sister, niece, or mother, he
shall be guilty of a misdemeanour, and shall be liable upon conviction
on indictment to be imprisoned, with or without hard labour, for any
term not exceeding two years.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account