Bischoff asserts that the third frontal convolution (Broca’s
convolution) is very slightly developed in the chimpanzee, orang,
and gibbon. “Its great development in men,” Gewährsmann writes,
“constitutes one of the most marked distinctions between the brains
of apes and of men.”[83] In most of the other species of apes this
convolution is altogether absent, but Pansch is justified in the
assertion that it is fully developed in anthropoids. I cannot wholly
agree with Pansch in his analysis; but I must accept his statement
on this point (see the orang, Fig. 59). Gratiolet remarks that the
so-called annectant gyri (_plis de passage_) which serve as a covering
or _operculum_ for the posterior lobes in apes, are only superficially
apparent in man. In the chimpanzee the upper of those convolutions
is absent, while it is large in the orang, and likewise large and
undulated in man. In the orang the second annectant gyrus is covered,
but this covering is absent in man.[84]
In considering the inner structure of the brain of these animals, we
are first struck by the shortness of the _corpus callosum_. The soft
and thick anterior commissure of the third cerebral ventricle and the
thin posterior commissure have also been justly noted. In the lateral
ventricles more of the characteristics described in the human brain are
absent. The four eminences resemble those of man; nor does the fourth
cerebral ventricle present any remarkable differences of form. Neither
does the base or lower surface of the brain display any important
deviation from the human type. The transverse section of the nerves at
their intersection appears to me, however, to be somewhat more oval
than is the case in man.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account