Alaska -- Antiquities; Eskimos; Eskimos -- Anthropometry; Indians of North America -- Alaska; Indians of North America -- Yukon
The next table gives the percentage relations of the basion-nasion
diameter to the mean diameter of the skull. The correlation of the two
is even closer than in the case of the skull length, and the grouping,
while in the main alike, seems in general even more in harmony with
that in previous comparisons. The St. Lawrence Island females are very
exceptional, as was also apparent in other connections. The unusual
smallness of their skull (compare section on Cranial module) is
evidently due to a poor development of its posterior half.
ESKIMO CRANIA: PERCENTAGE RELATION OF THE BASION-NASION DIAMETER TO
MEAN CRANIAL DIAMETER (CRANIAL MODULE)
(BN×100/CM)
BOTH SEXES TOGETHER IN ASCENDING ORDER
_Southwestern and Midwestern_
Pilot Station, Yukon 65.6
Chukchee 66.0
Little Diomede Island 66.1
Hooper Bay 66.4
Nelson Island 66.7
Togiak 66.9
Southwest Alaska 67.3
Indian Point, Siberia 67.4
Mumtrak 67.4
Nunivak Island 67.6
Pastolik 67.6
St. Michael Island 68.0
St. Lawrence Island:
Male 67.2
Female (69.6)
_Northwestern_
Wales 67.7
Point Barrow 67.8
Point Hope 68.1
Barrow 68.4
Old Igloos 69.0
Shishmaref 69.2
_Northern Arctic and northeastern_
Baffin Land 67.4
Hudson Bay 67.6
Smith Sound (male) 67.6
North Arctic 68.1
Greenland 68.5
Southampton Island 68.7
PROGNATHISM
Since better understood, the subject of facial prognathism has lost
much of its allure in anthropology; yet the matter is not wholly
without interest.
Facial protrusion is as a rule secondary to and largely caused by
alveolar protrusion, which in turn is caused by the size and shape of
the dental arch; and the dental arch is generally proportional to the
size of the teeth. The form of the arch is, however, quite influential.
With the teeth identical in size a narrow arch will be more, a broad
arch less protruding, and a narrow arch with small teeth may protrude
more than a broad one with larger teeth. Another influence is that of
the height of the upper face, the same arch protruding more in a low
face than in a high one. And still another factor is the incline of the
front teeth, though this affects merely the appearance of prognathism
and not its measurements.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account