"My husband's account of his telepathic experience is perfectly correct. For my own part I was extremely surprised at the circumstances, for till then my attitude towards all questions of clairvoyance had been one of almost complete incredulity. Let me add, however, that my husband is of an excessively nervous temperament, and was liable to somnambulism in his youth. It is seldom that a night passes in which he does not talk in his sleep. It would be quite possible to hold a conversation with him for a few minutes whilst he is in this condition." (_Annales des Sciences Psychiques_, vol. i. pp. 324, 325.) It seems permissible to conjecture that in this case Madame Dupré, as in the previous case Professor Richet, was the agent. _Transference of Emotion._ Sometimes the telepathic impulse appears to express itself in a vague feeling of alarm or distress. Of course, impressions of this sort, with no definite content, and not recognised at the time as having reference to any particular person, can do little to strengthen the proof of telepathy. But when it has been shown, by the mention of the experience beforehand, or by any unusual action consequent on its occurrence, that the emotion was unique in the history of the percipient, and when the coincidence with a serious crisis is clearly established, the telepathic explanation may be admitted as at least plausible. These conditions appeared to be fulfilled in the following case, which is quoted from the _Proceedings of the American S.P.R._ (pp. 474, 475). No. 48.--From MR. F. H. KREBS. The percipient in this case described his experience to Professor William James, of Harvard, who writes as follows:-- "Mr. Krebs (special student) stopped after the logic lesson of Friday, November 26, and told me the facts related in his narrative. "I advised him to put them on paper, which he has thus done. "His father is said by him to be too much injured to do any writing at present. "WM. JAMES. "_December_ 1, 1886." From MR. F. H. KREBS.