Apparitions and thought-transference: an examination of the evidence for telepathyPodmore, Frank
Philosophy
Apparitions and thought-transference: an examination of the evidence for telepathy
Podmore, Frank
Apparitions; Telepathy
In this case the apparition, it will have been observed, was mistaken
for a real person. We should not be justified, however, in concluding
that the sensory effect produced was comparable in intensity to that
which would have been caused had a real figure walked across the room.
Perception is so largely a psychical process that it is difficult in
any particular case to assign a definite value to the sensory element.
And in a case of this kind, where, as appears to be generally the case
with telepathic hallucinations, the vision is of brief duration, the
difficulty is, of course, increased.
The hallucination in this, as in the previous case, occurred some
hours before the death, and the evidential value of the coincidence is
so far lessened. But it is perhaps worth while pointing out that we
have no warrant in theory for concluding that in a case of death after
prolonged illness the actual moment of dissolution is more favourable
for the initiation of a telepathic impulse than any moment in the
hours or days of illness preceding death; nor, if due allowance be
made for the tendency to exaggerate the closeness of coincidence, is
it clear that there is sufficient evidence at present to support any
such conclusion. On the other hand, in cases of accident or momentary
illness, we have more than one case where the impression is shown, on
good evidence, to have occurred within, at most, an hour of death.[117]
In the narrative which follows, the vision, it will be seen, took place
some days before the actual death, during the crisis of a serious
illness, of which the percipient was not at the time aware.
No. 74.--From MRS. MCALPINE, Garscadden, Bearsden, Glasgow.
The following account was enclosed in a letter, dated April 12th, 1892.
We had previously received a somewhat briefer account, dated May 7th,
1891, which agrees in all essential particulars with the one printed
below:--
"On the 25th March 1891 my husband and I were staying at Furness
Abbey Hotel, Barrow-in-Furness, with a friend of ours, the late Mr.
A. D. Bryce Douglas, of Seafield Tower, Ardrossan. He was managing
director of the 'Naval Construction Armament Company,' and had
resided at Furness Abbey Hotel for some eighteen months or more. He
had invited us, along with a number of other friends, to the launch
of the _Empress of China_. We breakfasted with Mr. Bryce Douglas on
the day of the launch, the 25th, and afterwards saw the launch, had
luncheon at the shipyard, and returned to the hotel. He appeared
to be in his usual health and spirits (he was a powerfully-built
man, and justly proud of his fine constitution). The following
day (Thursday) he left with a party of gentlemen, to sail from
Liverpool to Ardrossan, on the trial trip of the _Empress of Japan_
(another large steamer which had been built at his yard).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account