Apparitions and thought-transference: an examination of the evidence for telepathyPodmore, Frank
Philosophy
Apparitions and thought-transference: an examination of the evidence for telepathy
Podmore, Frank
Apparitions; Telepathy
selected, the adverse chances would be reduced, roughly speaking,
to something like 15 to 1. But even so the results attained are
sufficiently striking.[51]
In these experiments the percipient or percipients themselves counted
the tilts; and it is probable that occasionally one or other of those
seated at the table half-consciously guided its movements in conformity
with his own ideas of what the letter would be. But in a modified form
of the experiment, introduced by Professor Richet, the percipients, two
or three in number, were seated at one table and a printed alphabet
was placed on another table behind the percipients and out of their
range of vision. When the first table tilted,[52] under the automatic
movements of the hands resting on it, it caused a bell to ring. M.
Richet or some other experimenter sat at the second table and drew
a pen slowly backwards and forwards over the printed alphabet. The
letters to which the pen was pointing when the bell rang were noted,
and it was found that they made up intelligible words and sentences,
provided that in some cases the next letter or the next but one were
substituted for that actually given.[53] All necessary precautions were
taken that the alphabet should be out of sight of the "mediums," who
were in most cases personal friends of M. Richet, and whose good faith
was, he believes, in all cases unimpeachable. Subjoined is an account
of the results obtained on one evening. M. Richet appears from the
account to have been one of those seated at the tilting table.
No. 27.--By PROFESSOR RICHET.
"On the 9th of November we took the same precautions, but used
an ordinary alphabet, not the circular one.[54] The name of the
'spirit' who came to the table was given as V I L L O N. Then we
made a great noise, we repeated poetry, sang, and counted to such
good purpose that P., who was at the alphabet, could hardly follow
the ringing of the bell. We asked for some French poetry. The reply
was--
Q U S N N T K F S N E I G D R D A M S A M
_O U, S O N T, L E S, N E I G E S, D A N T A N_
That is, "Ou sont les neiges d'Antan?"--a verse of Villon's, obviously
known to us all.
We then asked, what were the relations of Villon with the kings of
France?
K O U H T L E C R U E L
_L O U I S, L E, C R U E L_
Louis le cruel.
What book ought we to read?
E S S A Y S U R D A D M O N I N M A N H P
_E S S A Y, S U R, D A E M O N I O M A N I E_
The reader will understand that if I mention these experiments, it is
not because the answers are interesting in themselves, but because the
precautions taken seemed sufficient to prevent the medium from gaining
any knowledge of the movements of the operator at the alphabet.... I
add a few more replies; but the number and intrinsic significance of
these replies is a matter of but little importance.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account