Apparitions and thought-transference: an examination of the evidence for telepathyPodmore, Frank
Philosophy
Apparitions and thought-transference: an examination of the evidence for telepathy
Podmore, Frank
Apparitions; Telepathy
Of course in experiments of this kind no precautions could exclude
the chance that some suggestion of what was expected might reach the
percipient's mind through the gestures, the attitude, or even the
silence of the experimenter. But, acting on the clue thus given, MM.
Gibert and Janet succeeded in impressing mentally on Madame B. commands
which were punctually executed on the following day. During the same
period Dr. Gibert made three attempts, all of which met with partial
success, in inducing the hypnotic trance by mental suggestion given at
a distance. Subsequently, during February and March 1886, and again
during April and May of the same year, these trials were repeated with
striking results. During one of the trials which took place in April
Mr. F. W. H. Myers and Dr. A. T. Myers were present, and from their
contemporary record the following account is taken. Throughout these
trials, it should be stated, Madame B. was in the Pavillon, a house
occupied by Dr. Gibert's sister, and distant about two-thirds of a mile
from Dr. Gibert's own house. The distance intervening between agent and
percipient in this series of experiments was in no case less than a
quarter of a mile or more than one mile. In the first trial described
by Mr. Myers (18 in the subjoined table) Madame B. actually went to
sleep about twenty minutes after the effort at willing had been made;
but as some of the party had in the interval entered the house where
she was and found her awake, it seems possible that their coming had
suggested the idea of sleep. In the second case (No. 19) an attempt to
will Madame B. to leave her bed at 11.35 P.M. and come to Dr. Gibert's
house had failed--the only result, possibly due to other causes, being
an unusually prolonged sleep and a headache on waking. Subsequently, to
quote Mr. Myers' account,
"(20) On the morning of the 22nd we again selected by lot an hour
(11 A.M.) at which M. Gibert should will, from his dispensary
(which is close to his house), that Madame B. should go to sleep
in the Pavillon. It was agreed that a rather longer time should be
allowed for the process to take effect; as it had been observed
(see M. Janet's previous communication) that she sometimes
struggled against the influence, and averted the effect for a time
by putting her hands in cold water, etc. At 11.25 we entered the
Pavillon quietly, and almost at once she descended from her room
to the _salon_, profoundly asleep. Here, however, suggestion might
again have been at work. We did not, of course, mention M. Gibert's
attempt of the previous night. But she told us in her sleep that
she had been very ill in the night, and repeatedly exclaimed:
'Pourquoi M. Gibert m'a-t-il fait souffrir? Mais j'ai lavé les
mains continuellement.' This is what she does when she wishes to
avoid being influenced.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account