22 24th Nov. 2.30 P.M. F. 23 3rd Dec. 4.10 P.M. F. 24 5th Dec. 4.10 P.M. F. 25 6th Dec. 4.10 P.M. Found awake, washing her hands ? 26 7th Dec. 2.30 P.M. Found asleep at 3.5 ? 27 10th Dec. 4.20 P.M. She was out walking F. 28 11th Dec. 3.15 P.M. ? 29 13th Dec. 4.5 P.M. Found asleep at 4.25. Had been seen awake a few minutes after 4 P.M. S. 30 14th Dec. 11.30 A.M. F. 31 18th Dec. F. 32 21st Dec. F. 33 22nd Dec. F. 34 23rd Dec. 3 P.M. Found asleep at 3.40 ? 35 25th Dec. 3.15 P.M. She was out walking. Bad headache came on at 3.20. Returned hurriedly, and at once fell asleep in the _salon_. S. Throughout the series, except in case 10, M. Janet was the operator. It will be seen that in the 35 trials there were nine cases in which Madame B. was found asleep within half-an-hour of the attempt being made to entrance her. In six other cases she was found asleep after a longer interval, but there is nothing to indicate that the sleep did not actually supervene at the right time. In one case she was found awake within fifteen minutes of the trial, but stated that she had been awakened by the ringing of the bell which announced M. Janet's arrival. In one other case she was found washing her hands to ward off the trance. Of the 17 failures Madame B. was out walking in four cases at the time of the trial, a circumstance which no doubt diminished the chances of success. In two cases headache or disturbance were produced; of the remaining 11 trials no details are given, and it is presumed that no unusual effect was observed, and that there was no apparent cause for the failure. Of course, experiments carried on under these conditions, the trials being confined for the most part within a narrow range of hours, and the subject liable to spontaneous trance, offer some scope for chance coincidence. But as Madame B. actually fell asleep spontaneously on only four occasions during the period over which the trials extended, it will probably be considered that the number of coincidences, imperfect as they were, was considerably more