Appletons' Popular Science Monthly, May, 1900: Vol. 57, May, 1900 to October, 1900Various
Science
Appletons' Popular Science Monthly, May, 1900: Vol. 57, May, 1900 to October, 1900
Various
Science -- Periodicals; Technology -- Periodicals
We gain, only to see that more gain is possible; the
opportunity for advance is infinite. Forever and ever thought can reach
out into the unknown, and never need to weep because there are no more
worlds to conquer.
It was the study of electro-chemical changes which led Berzelius to
his electro-chemical theory of combination, and then to the dualistic
theory, which has already been mentioned. In or about the year 1832,
when the Berzelian doctrines were at the summit of their fame, Faraday
showed that the chemical power of a current was directly proportioned
to the quantity of electricity which passed, and this led him to
believe that chemical affinity and electric energy were identical.
Electrolysis, the electrical decomposition of compounds in solution,
was a special object of his attention, and by quantitative methods he
found that the changes produced could be stated in terms of chemical
equivalents or combining numbers. One equivalent weight of zinc
consumed in the galvanic battery yields a current which will deposit
one equivalent of silver from its solution, or which, decomposing
water, will liberate one equivalent each of oxygen and hydrogen. All
electro-chemical changes followed this simple law, which gave new
emphasis to the atomic theory, and furnished a new means for measuring
the combining numbers.
In the early days of electro-chemistry the products of electrolysis
were studied in the light of the dualistic theory. But as chemical
investigation along other lines overthrew this hypothesis, a closer
examination of electrolytic reactions became necessary. Electrical
decompositions were dualistic in character, but the dualism was
not that taught by Berzelius. When a salt, dissolved in water, is
decomposed by the current it is separated into two parts, which Faraday
called its _ions_; in Berzelian terms these were in most cases oxides,
but this conclusion fitted only a part of the facts, and finally was
abandoned. Whatever the _ions_ might be, they were not ordinary oxides.
Many and long were the investigations bearing upon this subject
before a satisfactory settlement was reached. The phenomena observed
in solutions, raised still another question, that of the nature of
solution itself, and this is not yet fully answered. Two lines of
study, however, have converged, within recent years, to some remarkable
conclusions, the latest large development of chemical theory.
It has long been known that solutions of salts do not freeze so
easily as pure water, and also that their boiling points are higher.
In 1883 Raoult discovered a remarkable relation between the freezing
point of a solution and the molecular weight of the substance
dissolved, a relation which has since been elaborately studied by
many investigators. From either the freezing-point depression or the
elevation of the boiling point the molecular weight of a soluble
compound can now be calculated, and many uncertain molecular weights
have thus been determined.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account