St. Aelred of Rievaux, who died in 1166, relates that lepers were
cleansed at the tomb of St. Ninian at Whithern in Galloway—“ad ejus
namque sacratissimum tumulum curantur infirmi, mundantur
leprosi.”—(_Vit. S. Ninian_, cap. xi.) He mentions specially two
cases:—
“Visi sunt præterea venire in civitatem viri duo leprosi. Qui
præsumptuosum æstimantes cum lepræ contagio scabiem tangere,
quasi delonge poscunt auxilium. Accedentes autem ad fontem, et
sanctum arbitrantes quidquid sanctus contigerat Ninianus,
lavacio illo se abluendos putarunt.... Mundantur leprosi tactu
lavacio, sed meritis Niniani.”—(_Vit. S. Niniani_, cap. xi. §
4; Pinkert. _Vit. Antiq. SS. Scot._, pp. 22, 23.)
All these writers—St. Aelred of Rievaux, Joceline of Furnes, and the
compiler of the Aberdeen Breviary—wrote so long after the Saints whose
miracles they commemorate, that their testimony cannot avail as proof in
itself of the existence of leprosy in Scotland in the seventh and eighth
centuries. Besides, they speak only in general terms—“leprosos
mundabat,”—which may be little or nothing more than a rhetorical
flourish. But the passages which have been quoted are at least
sufficient to demonstrate that in the twelfth century the existence of
leprosy in Scotland from a remote age was a matter of unquestioned
belief. Of the general prevalence of the disease on this side of the
Tweed in that and the subsequent age, there is abundant evidence
elsewhere in the Leges Burgorum and other ancient capitularies of Scotch
law.
The canon of the Scotch Church, “De monitionem faciendo leprosis,”
printed in the Registrum Episcopatus Aberdonensis, vol. ii. p. 32, and
elsewhere, belongs to the thirteenth century, probably to the latter
part of that century. If, as seems to be the case, it be merely a
diocesan statute, and not a statute for the whole of Scotland, it will
only show more forcibly the general prevalence of the disease. The
diocese for which it was enacted was apparently Aberdeen, containing at
that time about eighty parishes, and the number of lepers must have been
great before it could be found necessary to guard against the injury
done to the parochial clergy by the withdrawal of the dues and oblations
of the inmates of the leper hospitals.
LEPROSY IN WALES.
The Venedotian Code (the Laws of the Women)—
“Should her husband be leprous, or have fetid breath, or be
incapable of marital duties; if on account of one of these
three things she leave her husband, she is to have the whole
of her property.”—(_Ancient Laws and Institutes of Wales_, p.
39. Lond. 1841.)
The Dimetian Code (of Women)—
“For three causes, if a woman desert her husband, she is not
to lose her agweddi [dowry]; for leprosy, want of connection,
and bad breath.”—(_Ancient Laws and Institutes of Wales_, p.
255.)
The Laws of Howel Dda, according to the Gwentian Code (of Women)—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account