Architecture : $b nineteenth and twentieth centuriesHitchcock, Henry-Russell
History
Architecture : $b nineteenth and twentieth centuries
Hitchcock, Henry-Russell
Architecture, Modern -- 19th century; Architecture, Modern -- 20th century
The characteristic and almost universal use of Grecian forms in domestic
building, however, in many parts of the country continuing down to the
Civil War of 1861-5, was the result of no foreign influence. Moreover,
the Grecian details were not drawn by most architects and builders from
the great basic treatise of Stuart and Revett, available in America only
to a very few, but at second hand from the local Builders’ Guides[84]
prepared by Haviland in Philadelphia, Asher Benjamin (1773-1845) in
Boston, Minard Lafever (1798-1854) in New York, and various others. Such
authors consciously Americanized what they borrowed from European
sources in order to adapt Classical masonry forms to the ubiquitous
wooden construction of the American countryside.
There are two levels of Romantic Classicism in America. Work of the
upper professional level is found chiefly in the big eastern cities
where architects operated who were either themselves foreign-born and
foreign-trained or else pupils and emulators of such. The lower
vernacular level is more conspicuous in America than in Europe because
it includes a much greater proportion of building production than in
older countries, where so many structures of earlier periods remain
extant. ‘Carpenter’s Grecian’, so to call it, represents the perhaps
naïve, but culturally significant, determination of all who built to
exploit, in some degree at least, the modern style of their day.
The frontiersman in the Oregon of 1850 when raising a tavern in the
Willamette Valley thus shared with the new and old royalties of Europe
the satisfaction of architectural patronage. Moreover, like so many
English gentlemen of the eighteenth century or such a nineteenth-century
prince as Frederick William IV, he often took a hand at design himself.
In this he was assisted by memories of the relatively settled towns he
had left behind in the Middle West, themselves largely products of this
period architecturally, and also by the Builders’ Guides issuing from
the east in recurrent editions.
It was not alone the transient patronage of a Corsican soldier, for a
few brief years heir to Louis XIV and overlord of Europe, nor the
Building Committee of an autocrat on the banks of the Neva controlling
all public and private architecture in an Imperial capital for a quarter
of a century, that really established Romantic Classicism as the last
universal style before that of our own day. It is the fact that Boston
architects and builders, when Quincy granite (that most perfect of
Romantic Classical building materials) became readily available in the
mid twenties, arrived at a rational sort of trabeated design as
distinguished as Schinkel’s; while three thousand miles to the west, and
a quarter of a century later, amateur builders working in wood produced
almost the same sort of ‘pilastrades’, simplified well beyond the
Americanized paradigms of Greek antae they found in the plates of Asher
Benjamin’s books, as Schinkel had in Berlin.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account