Architecture : $b nineteenth and twentieth centuriesHitchcock, Henry-Russell
History
Architecture : $b nineteenth and twentieth centuries
Hitchcock, Henry-Russell
Architecture, Modern -- 19th century; Architecture, Modern -- 20th century
Picturesque also are certain aspects of the Houses of Parliament,
notably the contrast in shape and placing of the two towers at the ends
and, above all, the silhouette of the Clock Tower, almost certainly one
of Pugin’s personal contributions to the design (Plate 54). But
essentially the Houses of Parliament, as might be expected of Barry,
their architect, are one of the grandest academic productions of the
nineteenth century. Summerson has suggested a relationship to Fonthill
Abbey in the way the plan is organized round a central octagon; there
may also be an echo of Wyatville’s east front of Windsor in the
composition of the river front. But except for the incorporation of the
medieval Westminster Hall, the Crypt Chapel, and the Cloister Court,
which necessitated irregularity along the landward side, the plan is
almost as regular and as classically logical in its balanced provision
for multiple functions as a pupil[125] of Durand might have developed.
Equally regular are the façades and, in the case of the principal front
towards the river, elaborately symmetrical as well.
The rich Late Gothic detail was provided in incredible profusion by
Pugin, who worked under Barry against his own developing taste for
earlier and less lacy Gothic forms. Doubtless, like the towers, this
detailing reflects the Picturesque, but the extreme regularity of the
façades provides also the characteristic reiterations of Romantic
Classicism. Pugin is supposed to have said that the river front was ‘all
Greek’, a considerable exaggeration. But just as Highclere shows what
Barry’s basic principles of design could produce when expressed in the
revived Jacobethan mode, so without too great a strain one can imagine
this front executed with some sort of Renaissance detailing, if hardly
in columnar Grecian guise.
Commissioned in 1836, the Houses of Parliament rose slowly. The House of
Lords was opened in 1847; the House of Commons only in 1852, the year of
Pugin’s early death. Even at the time of Barry’s death in 1860 the whole
group was still not finished, although his eldest son (Edward Middleton,
1830-80) made but few personal contributions when he took over control
and finally completed the job later in the decade. During this extended
period of about thirty years the Puginian phase of the Gothic Revival
had been initiated and run its entire course; even the succeeding High
Victorian Gothic was more than half-way over by the mid sixties. Like
the Napoleonic monuments of Paris, which were also a generation
a-building, the Houses of Parliament belong historically to the period
of their beginning. They are not quite pre-Victorian, since construction
above ground began only in 1840 after considerable revision of the
competition design, but they are definitely Early Victorian.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account