Architecture : $b nineteenth and twentieth centuriesHitchcock, Henry-Russell
History
Architecture : $b nineteenth and twentieth centuries
Hitchcock, Henry-Russell
Architecture, Modern -- 19th century; Architecture, Modern -- 20th century
Yet, in France as in England, a new and more serious phase of the Gothic
Revival did open in the late thirties, stimulated by the ideals of
Catholic Revival of a series of writers from Chateaubriand to
Montalembert. No great Gothic public monument like the Houses of
Parliament in London was initiated in these years in Paris—nor for that
matter at any later date—but several churches designed around 1840 were
at least intended to be as exemplary as Pugin’s; they were also
considerably more ambitious in their size and their elaboration than
most of those his Catholic clients and the Camdenians’ Anglican ones
were sponsoring in England at this point.
A curious example of the change in taste is the Chapelle-Saint-Louis at
Dreux.[139] The original chapel was built in 1816-22 by an architect
named Cramail (or Cramailler) as a Classical rotunda to serve as the
mausoleum of the Orléans family. In 1839 Louis Philippe ordered its
remodelling and enlargement in Gothic style by P.-B. Lefranc
(1795-1856), desiring thus to associate the Orleanist dynasty with the
medieval glories of French royalty in a manner already fashionable[140]
with intellectuals to the left and to the right, if not with many
architects. The new exterior, completed in 1848 just as the Orléans rule
came to an end, is in a very lacy and unplausible sort of Gothick, not
without a certain still rather eighteenth-century Rococo charm but quite
inharmonious with the Classical interior. Like another Royal mausoleum
of these years, the Chapelle-Saint-Ferdinand in the Avenue Pershing in
Neuilly, built in 1843 in memory of an Orléans prince who had been
killed in an accident near its site, the Chapelle-Saint-Louis has
stained glass windows designed in 1844 by no less an artist than Ingres.
These are even less appropriate in association with Lefranc’s Gothic
than with the Romanesquoid mode that the elderly Fontaine—who knew, like
Talleyrand, how to maintain his position under several successive
regimes—used for the Neuilly chapel. They are hardly superior in
quality, moreover, to the glass, whether imported from Germany or
produced locally, that was being used in the early forties in England
for Neo-Gothic churches.
A more important Gothic project of this date than the
Chapelle-Saint-Louis was that for the large new Paris church of
Sainte-Clotilde prepared in 1840 by F.-C. Gau (1790-1853), German-born
but a pupil of Lebas. Doubts as to the extensive use of iron proposed by
Gau held up the initiation of the construction of Sainte-Clotilde until
1846, so that several provincial Neo-Gothic edifices of some consequence
were executed first. These may be compared, but only to their
disadvantage, with Pugin’s churches of around 1840 as regards their
plausibility, their intrinsic architectonic qualities, and the elegance
of their detail. However, several of them are larger and more
ambitious—being Catholic churches in a Catholic country—than are even
his various cathedrals.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account