Architecture : $b nineteenth and twentieth centuriesHitchcock, Henry-Russell
History
Architecture : $b nineteenth and twentieth centuries
Hitchcock, Henry-Russell
Architecture, Modern -- 19th century; Architecture, Modern -- 20th century
In 1851, following immediately after the Hope house, came the designing
of the Great Western Hotel at Paddington in London by the Hardwicks.
This was still, one should note, before the Second Empire actually began
in France. Gawky though this hotel is, and very uncertain in its use of
French precedent, contemporaries generally recognized its inspiration as
derived from the period of Louis XIV. The complex massing and the broken
skyline, with roofs of different heights and pavilion-like towers at the
ends, are much more obviously a premonition of the Second Empire mode in
the form the world outside France would shortly adopt it than were the
London and New York houses of two years earlier. Unlike Dusillion and
Lienau, moreover, the architects of the Great Western Hotel, recognized
masters of the dying Greek Revival as well as of the rising Gothic and
Renaissance Revivals, were not French-trained.
If the international Second Empire mode had thus, in a sense, beginnings
outside France, it is nevertheless true that its spiritual headquarters
was in Paris. The prestige of the new Emperor’s capital, a prestige
rapidly regained after more than a generation of desuetude, quite as
much as the visual appeal of multiple mansards and pavilioned façades,
explains the world-wide success of the mode during, and even well after,
the eighteen years that the Second Empire lasted.
It was in 1852 that Napoleon, then Prince-President, made himself
Emperor. He had already signalized, a few months earlier, his ambition
to revive the splendours not alone of his uncle’s rule but those of
earlier French monarchs by his decision to complete the Louvre[182]—or
more accurately to connect the Louvre with the Tuileries. This was a
project over which generations of architects had struggled on paper and
at which several abortive starts had already been made. Visconti
received the commission, not Duban, who had been engaged since 1848 on
what was proving a highly controversial restoration of the old Louvre.
Visconti was chosen not for his reputation as a private architect but
largely because a succession of public projects for new library
buildings in Paris that he had been asked to prepare under Louis
Philippe and even under the Second Republic had all fallen through, and
it was felt he deserved an important commission from the State. Perhaps
also his Tomb of Napoleon I at the Invalides made him especially
sympathetic to Napoleon III.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account