Architecture : $b nineteenth and twentieth centuriesHitchcock, Henry-Russell
History
Architecture : $b nineteenth and twentieth centuries
Hitchcock, Henry-Russell
Architecture, Modern -- 19th century; Architecture, Modern -- 20th century
Here, at its heart, the contrast between setting and monument in Second
Empire Paris is at its most extreme, even though this setting is far
richer and more plastic than that provided by the severely flat houses
that surround the Arc de l’Étoile. Just as there, however, the use of a
giant order on all the big blocks that form the _place_ reveals the
distinctly academic taste of the leading French architects in this
period; but Blondel’s rounded pavilions, where two major streets come in
on either side at an angle, provide an almost Baroque elaboration in the
grouping of the various masses by which the complex space is defined
(Plate 70C). Certainly the result is very different from the large open
areas surrounded by discrete blocks of plain geometrical shape favoured
by Romantic Classicism.
The Opéra is sumptuous in a rather different way from the New Louvre
(Plate 70B). Yet in Garnier’s work, as in Lefuel’s, a generically
Neo-Baroque effect is achieved with elements mostly High Renaissance in
origin, but here Italian rather than French. The richly coloured
marbles, the admirably placed sculpture by Carpeaux, and above all the
fashion in which the masses pile up—from the ornate colonnade crowning
the main façade, through the half-dome which expresses the auditorium
externally, to the tall stage-house at the rear—is much richer
plastically than the somewhat repetitive scheme of the New Louvre. The
whole, moreover, is made fully three-dimensional by the comparable
organization of the major elements at the sides and on the rear. Thus
Garnier provided a visual equivalent to the complex ordering of his
extremely elaborate plan, a plan the undoubted virtues of which can be
fully appreciated only on paper (Figure 15). Inside the Opéra the great
staircase, the foyer, and the actual auditorium drip with somewhat
brassy gold and the profusion of detail has a curiously un-Renaissance
spikiness and lumpiness (Plate 71). This quality underlines how
un-archaeological was Garnier’s approach, how responsive he was (perhaps
unconsciously) to the new tastes of the mid century that had produced
the High Victorian[189] Gothic in England in the previous decade and
fostered generally the international success of the Second Empire mode.
When Eugénie asked him what the ‘style’ of the Opéra was—_Louis XIV_,
_Louis XV_, _Louis XVI_—he replied with both tact and accuracy: ‘C’est
du Napoléon III’.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account