Architecture : $b nineteenth and twentieth centuriesHitchcock, Henry-Russell
History
Architecture : $b nineteenth and twentieth centuries
Hitchcock, Henry-Russell
Architecture, Modern -- 19th century; Architecture, Modern -- 20th century
After Paris the most extensive and sumptuous example of the
re-organization of a great city carried out in this period is not in
Italy but in Austria. Vienna had been relatively inactive
architecturally in the first half of the nineteenth century under
Francis I (see Chapter 2). His successor Francis Joseph, however, who
came to the throne in 1848, set out in the following decades as _Kaiser_
and _König_ to see that his Imperial and Royal capitals should rival
Napoleon III’s Paris. In 1857 the fortifications surrounding the old
city of Vienna were removed, and the following year Ludwig Förster
(1797-1863) won the competition for the layout of the Ringstrasse that
was to take their place. The execution of this project, with many
modifications, took some thirty years (Plate 74). Outside the actual
walls there had been a wide glacis, and therefore the Ring could be
developed not merely as a series of wide tree-lined boulevards like
those of Paris but with large open spaces in which major public
buildings were grouped. These edifices are even more various in style
than the comparable ones in Paris, despite the fact that they were the
work of a very closely knit group of architects. None of them is of
specifically Second Empire character, though the high mansards and the
pavilion composition of the New Louvre were used fairly frequently on
private buildings in Vienna and throughout the Austro-Hungarian Empire.
The earliest major project of Francis Joseph was the construction of the
Arsenal, begun in 1849, where most of the leading architects of the
period worked (see Chapter 2). All in various versions of the
_Rundbogenstil_, this group of buildings culminates in the centrally
placed Army Museum of 1856-77 by Förster and his Danish son-in-law
Theophil von Hansen (1813-91). On this the very ornate detail is
Byzantinesque and Saracenic in inspiration, yet it is not without a
distinctive flavour that is unmistakably of this particular period: the
brilliant polychromy of the red and yellow brick walls almost seems to
echo, like Vaudoyer’s Marseilles cathedral, the bolder effects of the
contemporary High Victorian Gothic architects of England.
Ferstel’s bank in the Herrengasse of 1856-60, also _Rundbogenstil_, has
been mentioned earlier. The North Railway Station of 1858-65 by Theodor
Hoffmann was _Rundbogenstil_ of an even more ornate sort, with only a
rather modest iron-and-glass-roofed shed set between its two massive
masonry blocks. This was badly damaged by bombing in the last War but
not totally destroyed. On the other hand, the South Station, built in
1869-73 by Wilhelm Flattich (1826-1900), a pupil of Leins in Stuttgart,
was of rather conventional High Renaissance character.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account